Now you're simply backtracking by trying to compare golf history with real "important" matters. I never said this was important in a vast, universal sense (although, considering current events, it could be argued that the pursuit of truth is more important than ever).
But the venue matters. You're not on some generalist website. You're on a site solely dedicated to golf architecture. So in that context, it's certainly important.
Since the "time" invested is seemingly all it takes to garner your respect, would you likewise be thankful for a long-form piece on how Robert Trent Jones Sr. is actually a descendant of the planet Golfdar, sent to Earth to proliferate bowling alley fairways and to propagate as many future golf course architects as possible? It could take me hours, days, or even weeks to write it, so I bet you'd love it!
For the record, I'm not taking any sides here. All I know is many of the "facts" presented in the essay have come under question, and I think it would be good to examine those further. (And if it was my website, I'd probably prefer that not be done publicly after writing such a glowing introduction to said essay.)