News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Matt Schoolfield

  • Karma: +0/-0
This is related to a bit of local San Francisco politics. In this last election, an extremely controversial measure was passed which promises to turn the main thoroughfare along Ocean Beach into a city park. Now, as I've gone on and on before about, this huge section of land exists effectively as linksland: they literally have to plow the sand off of the road as parts of the dunes try to move around. Now, for local budget deficit reasons, there is no funding for the building of the park, but I just wondered if designing a large, seaside park would be something that golf course architects would be interested in.

I think golf course architecture is relevant here, specifically because this type of land is regularly worked on for golf courses, but more importantly, because much of the area of the new parkland sits below the largest dunes, I see golf course architects as exceptionally talented at guiding people in and out of scenic vistas in dunes, while maintaining a natural landscape.

So what do you all think? Has it happened before? Is this all nonsense where I don't understand the scope of city park vs golf course design? I'd appreciate your thoughts.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 10:13:26 PM by Matt Schoolfield »
GCA Browser Addon v2.0.1: Firefox/Chrome

My stuff:

John Emerson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Is that what St. Andrews basically is?
“There’s links golf, then everything else.”

Kevin_Reilly

  • Karma: +0/-0
SF can't even maintain road medians (Sunset Blvd) or adjacent green areas (Park Presidio), or lawn bowling/putting greens (Stern Grove and Moscone Park) so it is unrealistic to assume that they could maintain a newly constructed park out on the Upper Great Highway.  It is unfortunately only a matter of time before conditions at the new Golden Gate Park course become "terrible".


Interesting question, but I assume there are many landscape designers of parks that could do this hypothetical job.  The sand on the Great Highway is an inevitable intrusion that would have to be factored into maintenance.
"GOLF COURSES SHOULD BE ENJOYED RATHER THAN RATED" - Tom Watson

Chris Hughes

  • Karma: +0/-0
SF can't even maintain road medians (Sunset Blvd) or adjacent green areas (Park Presidio), or lawn bowling/putting greens (Stern Grove and Moscone Park) so it is unrealistic to assume that they could maintain a newly constructed park out on the Upper Great Highway.  It is unfortunately only a matter of time before conditions at the new Golden Gate Park course become "terrible".


Interesting question, but I assume there are many landscape designers of parks that could do this hypothetical job.  The sand on the Great Highway is an inevitable intrusion that would have to be factored into maintenance.




Agree that the City of SF in no way has the intellectual/management/fiscal horsepower to develop/maintain/manage anything on the property, much less a "park" with no associated revenues to underpin the long-term viability of the space/project.


Next best option that actually keeps the area as a green space, and allows it to be self-sustaining?


Maybe a golf course?
"Is it the Chicken Salad or the golf course that attracts and retains members ?"

Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back