George:
I know you're an Oakmont guy as I am an Oakland Hills guy. So prejudice is on the table.
However, watching Oakmont this week and seeing the past two opens on site it is sad to see the artificially built up tees; say 7, 17, and 18 for starters. and several more. The golf course is NOT laid on the land as Fownes designed it. In fact number 17 is now a reverse land movement tee shot. Might as well build a steel frame platform with a carpet on it. Oakland Hills does have one artificially built up hill tee at #7, but it is a much mote natural looking complex, and a beautiful spectator mound for viewing 4 and 5. The contrast between the two courses is so striking as one has a freeway and rr thru it dividing the course and creating industrial background sound and the other of course all of one piece. Oakland brings back the Golden Age with widening of the fairways and a return to Ross's original bunkering locations, not brought in and narrowed, along with narrowed fairways.
We in the Detroit area are starved for Opens and Amateurs on "our" major course. The infrastructure problems that Oakmont and Merion have with restricted areas around the clubhouse, practice areas miles away (Merion), tees only used in majors (you too Old Course). Come to Detroit where its all there in one place with room for all you need on one of the great natural properties for golf. "The lord intended ...."
Once again kudos to Hanse/Wagner and team.
Thanks for allowing this rant.
Anthony
Hi Anthony -
Your rant is most welcome. I believe in the power of open and frank discussion to elicit the best conclusions for anything, but especially something as both meaningless and meaningful as golf.
Just a couple things -
I'm an Oakmont fan, not an Oakmont guy. Many have assumed the latter over the years, as I have admittedly touted the course more than anyone on here. I am happy to praise the tree removal, as I am most decidedly not a fan of trees on golf courses, but the rest of the work is something I choose not to comment on, as I don't believe it is my place. The bones of the course - the layout, the greens, etc - are what I will always focus on, apologies if that rings hollow to anyone.
I will say, I thought about posting on here yesterday (before the televised play, but ended up having to work instead) that I feel it is incredibly important for people to realize how much TV flattens Oakmont, like other notables such as Augusta and probably Oakland Hills and many other golden age courses as well.
When I started watching yesterday, they were on the 4th. They showed the tee shot, and I was flat out (no pun intended) stunned at how NOT elevated the tee shot appeared. In person, it struck me personally as hugely elevated, not in a built up tee sense, but rather hitting from the same hill that creates the magnificent 3rd green complex. I wasn't playing the way backs, but man, we were definitely hitting from a hill, whereas the TV just made it seem like a gentle grade down.
Likewise, holes like #9 and #17, those are significant hills to hit up. They don't appear that way at all on TV, and apparently if you routinely hit it 320 like these young guys, they don't play that much uphill either. But that's more a statement on how the governing bodies have failed to control the equipment than a statement of the routing and greens at Oakmont.
Like I said before, I welcome your comments, and hope to see the USGA return to OH soon. I thought the last few events there were terrific.
-----
Kalen, man, if you need the ocean to get jazzed, that's on you. It is important to understand we had significant other weather issues in the area for the past week - heavy rains, lightning, etc - that really slowed the course down. I've never seen so many approach shots, and even approach putts, stop so close to the hole as in this event. It didn't really change my feelings at all, but it did make me a bit wistful for a drier, firmer and more diabolical Oakmont....