Can you really compare the 2 courses even beyond the obvious differences such as elevation changes, etc. I don't see the quirkiness of TOC anywhere at ANGC and that to me is an essential element of TOC. How about the enormous greens at TOC and it doesn't seem that the green complexes play similarly.
Some ways both courses seem to me similar, at least as Mac designed/built ANGC:
* Very little rough;
* No or few trees, which along with the first point meant few lost balls and the ability to virtually always play your shots;
* Very little earthmoving;
* Strategic shotmaking all around the course, from tee to green;
* Natural contours serve as 'hazards' and frame much of the play;
* Greens that require correct approach shots. What Ran says about TOC, that "one could hit every every fairway and every green in regulation and still not score better than 80," applies to ANGC too.
* So flexible in design they work equally well for everyday play as well as major tournaments for pro's.
IIRC Mackenzie used at least three TOC holes as templates at ANGC: Eden, Road and #18. It's also interesting (telling?) that Nicklaus won 8 of his 18 majors at the two courses, or about 44%, while Tiger won 6 of his 14 (about 42%) at the same two courses.
As for quirk, did you see that Tiger Woods game version several years ago of the original ANGC? Blew me away.