Tom,
No problem at all. I would agree that I believe it's in the top 500, but definitely not in the top 100.
I've played 30 of the top 100 on the Golf Magazine 2015 list and 34 I believe of the top 100 in America - so enough to have a general sense of the quality we're talking about here.
I do think there's a difference between enjoyment of a course and architectural quality of a course. For instance I love say, Tobacco Road, but I would never expect anyone to talk about it among the best courses in the world. I've found that often the courses I enjoy the most aren't necessarily the ones that are top 100.
I enjoyed Ayodhya as a course more than Royal Troon, and perhaps Olympic Club, and in many ways do think it is a better course. Olympic, I'm just not sure I'm a good enough golfer to be able to truly look at that routing as enjoyable, and Royal Troon I thought was 6 boring holes, followed by 6 very good holes, followed by 6 more boring holes. That's just my opinion though.
What I liked about Ayodhya were the strategic options on many of the holes. The 8th as mentioned before being a good example. The third was another one. I had 225 over water to the green, or I could layup. The closer the layup the better angle to the green, but the narrower the fairway became, and a bunker on the right came into play. I liked the routing of Ayodhya with holes facing multiple directions, and with a nice variety of shots. The greens had undulation, yet in spots were subtle enough to force me to think. I also learned quickly it mattered where I put my drive, in relation to the angle of approach I'd take into the green.
All of those things I find it to have in common with some of the best courses in the world.