Ok I'm confused
Rees states it's a par 5, RJ says it's 210 yards.
Rees says it plays from left side-Is the second picture from the back of the green?
Rees says it's the 3rd holes, RJ asks if GCAers have a name for WBCC's second.
Of course I could just have a reading comprehension issue
Jeff & RJ
The hole I am talking about is the par 5 3rd hole, which is a shorter par 5 (510-520 from the back), so it allows decent hitters to reach in two. The first photo shows an angle where you play the hole coming in from the left side and the second photo is from the bottom corner. What I was thinking while I played this hole, is that it would make for a great green template for any variation of par. The ability to place numerous pin positions and accept shots from a wide range of clubs, would make this interesting to play no matter what you are faced with from the tee box.
The other hole description that Ronald pulled from their website is the par 5 6th hole (550-560 from the back), which based upon your landing area determines if you can reach in two, which can be pretty tough. If the Byron Nelson comment is true, then it seems that they would have repeated a distinct green shape for the two par 5's, which is a little strange to put them that close together on the course, but they thought highly enough of it to repeat.
RJ, as for the name, maybe "Drop - The drop in the green" or "Run - The ability to run the ball into any pin placement". And I see some where you are drawing the Double Plateau & Biarritz comparisons, but I think this is unique both visually & playability to be given a different name.