The thread title is spot on, and so is Mike Young's comment.
To me, it sounds like the perfect match -- both the membership and the architect have the same priorities. Quality is all about the greenbacks.
They are the last club that I can imagine doing a Seth Raynor restoration. And, honestly, I am not sure that would be the best use of the ground. They had Alister MacKenzie there in the late twenties -- after Raynor died with the course unfinished -- but MacKenzie didn't get along with somebody at the club, so his involvement ended almost as quickly as it began.
Mike Sweeney: I don't know what your unique affiliation is with MPCC, but if you are going to try to convince them to emulate Mountain Lake, Yale, or Southampton, I don't think you know them that well. My impression is that it is not the same sort of membership at all.