News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Carl Rogers

  • Karma: +0/-0
Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« on: June 16, 2014, 08:42:02 PM »
How much water & fertilizer does ANGC use each year?
I decline to accept the end of man. ... William Faulkner

jeffwarne

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2014, 08:43:31 PM »
How much water & fertilizer does ANGC use each year?

I bet Pinehurst uses more
"Let's slow the damned greens down a bit, not take the character out of them." Tom Doak
"Take their focus off the grass and put it squarely on interesting golf." Don Mahaffey

Anthony_Nysse

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2014, 08:53:21 PM »
How much water & fertilizer does ANGC use each year?

You're trying to compare a course that goes dormant from Nov-April to a courses that overseed. Very much apples to oranges
Anthony J. Nysse
Director of Golf Courses & Grounds
Apogee Club
Hobe Sound, FL

Carl Rogers

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2014, 08:56:27 PM »
Does anyone have a guess at the ANGC stats?
I decline to accept the end of man. ... William Faulkner

BCowan

Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2014, 09:03:49 PM »
When you bring up ''environment'' as a comparison you are already turning people (avg golfer) off going brown.  If one sells people on the idea of longer drives, the increased shot value, ect. you are going to lure more people to the idea. 

Jaeger Kovich

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #5 on: June 16, 2014, 09:41:01 PM »
Does ANGC allow carts? #2 does not. That makes a huge difference as well... In fact one of things that disappointed me in all the coverage and writing, is nobody once stood up and said that the restoration would not have been possible if they let golf carts anywhere but strictly paths only.

Mike_Young

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #6 on: June 16, 2014, 09:50:53 PM »
During the mid 80's the Sierra Club was bitching about ANGC and how they damaged the environment.  ANGC had a report published showing that the Sierra Club created more environmental damage in the creation of their brochure condemning ANGC than ANGC did in a year.   ;D
"just standing on a corner in Winslow Arizona"

Patrick_Mucci

Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #7 on: June 16, 2014, 10:05:28 PM »

How much water & fertilizer does ANGC use each year?

Less than Pinehurst, what's your point ?


Paul Jones

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #8 on: June 16, 2014, 10:11:07 PM »
During the mid 80's the Sierra Club was bitching about ANGC and how they damaged the environment.  ANGC had a report published showing that the Sierra Club created more environmental damage in the creation of their brochure condemning ANGC than ANGC did in a year.   ;D

Mike,

Any chance you have a copy of that report? That is funny.
Paul Jones
pauljones@live.com

Mike_Young

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #9 on: June 16, 2014, 10:14:17 PM »
During the mid 80's the Sierra Club was bitching about ANGC and how they damaged the environment.  ANGC had a report published showing that the Sierra Club created more environmental damage in the creation of their brochure condemning ANGC than ANGC did in a year.   ;D

Mike,

Any chance you have a copy of that report? That is funny.

Paul,
I don't.  I just remember calling on them that year and how it aggravated the greenchair and the supt etc...that was what we were told several times, so I assume they just had someone come up with it....
"just standing on a corner in Winslow Arizona"

Mike Bowen

Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #10 on: June 16, 2014, 10:53:08 PM »
As a non-turf guy, how is it possible that ANGC has such incredible course conditions but doesn't use that much water or fertilizer?

Patrick_Mucci

Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #11 on: June 16, 2014, 10:56:53 PM »

As a non-turf guy, how is it possible that ANGC has such incredible course conditions but doesn't use that much water or fertilizer?

Because they're closed half the year.

The incredible course conditions you see in April are what the course is groomed for as the year leads up to April.

You won't see those conditions in November, January or February.


jeffwarne

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #12 on: June 16, 2014, 11:11:13 PM »
As a non-turf guy, how is it possible that ANGC has such incredible course conditions but doesn't use that much water or fertilizer?

That and you can grow rye grass overseed on a driveway.
Not much watering required during winter.

and Pinehurst has 8+courses ;) ;D
"Let's slow the damned greens down a bit, not take the character out of them." Tom Doak
"Take their focus off the grass and put it squarely on interesting golf." Don Mahaffey

Josh Stevens

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #13 on: June 16, 2014, 11:58:55 PM »
Looking at the stats, Augusta does not have huge rainfall variation across the year, but still, the highest rainfall is June, July, August - matching the highest temperatures, so water usage is prob not so terrible.  Pinehurst is similar


Very different to the Mediterranean climate of Southern California where summers are very dry  and hot - massive water requirement as a result


Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #14 on: June 17, 2014, 05:05:14 AM »
The simple answer to the original post is that nobody in the golf business wants to risk their ticket to The Masters.

The other answer is that everything at Augusta is such a closely guarded secret that people would just be guessing.  But, it is certainly in their favor, not only that they are closed for a few months but that they play a small fraction of the number of rounds that are put across Pinehurst #2 in the course of a year.

Carl Rogers

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #15 on: June 17, 2014, 07:20:34 AM »
I see I have asked a not so innocent question .............. ?
I decline to accept the end of man. ... William Faulkner

Keith Grande

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #16 on: June 17, 2014, 09:24:32 AM »
I'd love to see ANGC in the summer, does it play firm and fast?  Or does the summer heat kill the bent grass?  I haven't seen pictures of the course during the summer.

Adam Lawrence

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #17 on: June 17, 2014, 09:28:59 AM »
I'd love to see ANGC in the summer, does it play firm and fast?  Or does the summer heat kill the bent grass?  I haven't seen pictures of the course during the summer.

Keith - it doesn't play at all in the summer. It shuts after the Masters and reopens in the autumn. Also, the underlying fairways are bermuda, not bent (the greens are bent though).
Adam Lawrence

Editor, Golf Course Architecture
www.golfcoursearchitecture.net

Principal, Oxford Golf Consulting
www.oxfordgolfconsulting.com

Author, 'More Enduring Than Brass: a biography of Harry Colt' (forthcoming).

Short words are best, and the old words, when short, are the best of all.

Keith Grande

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #18 on: June 17, 2014, 10:28:13 AM »
Adam, I'm aware that they close for the summer, was just curious what the conditions are during that time.

William_G

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #19 on: June 17, 2014, 10:52:04 AM »
The simple answer to the original post is that nobody in the golf business wants to risk their ticket to The Masters.

The other answer is that everything at Augusta is such a closely guarded secret that people would just be guessing.  But, it is certainly in their favor, not only that they are closed for a few months but that they play a small fraction of the number of rounds that are put across Pinehurst #2 in the course of a year.

+1
It's all about the golf!

Keith Grande

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #20 on: June 17, 2014, 11:05:50 AM »
Perhaps it can be quantified in gallons per round played.

Carl Rogers

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Why no environmental comparison between P#2 & ANGC?
« Reply #21 on: June 17, 2014, 11:26:27 AM »

How much water & fertilizer does ANGC use each year?

Less than Pinehurst, what's your point ?

The political element of it all.  ANGC has to be one of the symbols of the game. 
I decline to accept the end of man. ... William Faulkner