David,
That's a good point...I have sort of a hybrid take on muni golf. I have designed and built 5 for various municipalities. If a town is in a spot where there is no other privately owned public golf course competing then OK...BUT once the private sector comes in they need to make sure each is on the same playing field or shut it down.
There were some for-profit pay-for-play courses in Los Angeles back in the day, and they were built after a few of the Munis. Then real estate prices dictated higher and better uses for that land and those courses closed, but by your system the munis would have been long gone by that point. So then all that would be left would be the privates. Of course, if it weren't for the zoning laws
and open space property tax exemptions/reductions then many of those privates probably would be long gone as well. The land is worth a hell of a lot more for other uses than it is for golf. Golf doesn't work too well in metropolitan areas without at least some government involvement. Especially where people are making rational economic decisions based on the most profitable use of the land.
__________________________________________________
BCowan, the supposition that we'd be in the same situation today had muni golf never existed is too absurd to even address.