Steve
Pain of litigation? Is that possible, what could they sue for?
Sound like any shot that leaks right will now end up in sand. Why level off the opposite side of the green?
According to his fiends Carr and Smith, Geo Crump was unclear as to what he intended to do with this hole before he died (it wasn't quite finished). So they aren't following his plans (or lack of) at least.
I'm not trained in law, and since I was visiting only by the club's forbearance, it didn't occur to me to enter into a legal debate regarding the substance of a possible lawsuit. To put it another way, they were nice enough to let me out there with my camera as long as I promised to keep the photos private. They told me they do the same with all casual visitors.
Yes, anything right of the green will be in deep trouble, sand or worse, and facing up a steep hill with no view of the green or the flag.
I was told that the left side of the green was leveled off to allow more pin positions. This seems to be the trend in green countour alterations these days. Everyone but everyone is suffering from faster greens.
I don't have any insight into the reasoning behind the alterations right of the green. People I was with couldn't or wouldn't explain it, and since I don't know how it was before I can't even guess, except to say it looks like the new construction will fit with the overall penal design of the course.