News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.

Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Joe Stansell

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Controversial Holes
« Reply #50 on: February 27, 2012, 05:12:07 PM »
Quote from: Kalen Braley on February 27, 2012, 10:20:51 AM
I'm not sure how many would be ready to anoint it great, but I can't think of one at Wine Valley.

Love Wine Valley. Love it!

But no controversial holes? Any with ponds count as controversial -- especially hole #9.
Logged

Tim Pitner

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Controversial Holes
« Reply #51 on: February 27, 2012, 05:23:36 PM »
Bandon Dunes #16 seemed like a very controversial hole, back when people still considered BD worth talking about on this site.  I think it's a great hole, especially now that the fairway to the left was extended.  Plenty of drama can arise, both on the tee shot and the approach.
Logged

Kalen Braley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Controversial Holes
« Reply #52 on: February 27, 2012, 05:58:01 PM »
Quote from: Joe Stansell on February 27, 2012, 05:12:07 PM
Quote from: Kalen Braley on February 27, 2012, 10:20:51 AM
I'm not sure how many would be ready to anoint it great, but I can't think of one at Wine Valley.

Love Wine Valley. Love it!

But no controversial holes? Any with ponds count as controversial -- especially hole #9.

I would call #9 as a hole where I would have done it differently to avoid being near the pond...but I've never felt its controversial.

But its the "least" of any hole on the course in my book.

And if you are including #9 based on water, you must also do same for 3 and 6.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up