News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
An Interesting HWW Quote
« on: February 22, 2012, 07:39:05 AM »
"Whereas many Open courses have been aesthetic eyesores, with the omni-present rough burnt brown as a hayfield by the summer sun, Olympic (1966 Open), kept green and fresh by the moist air off the Pacific, was a treat." 

It would seem that we are trying to break a trend of at least 45 years and supported by perhaps THE doyen of American golf writers. 

Ciao
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

Mac Plumart

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: An Interesting HWW Quote
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2012, 08:01:46 AM »
Just in case you are as dumb as I am:

Turgid
1. swollen; distended; tumid.
2. inflated, overblown, or pompous; bombastic:
Sportsman/Adventure loving golfer.

Mac Plumart

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: An Interesting HWW Quote
« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2012, 09:14:34 AM »
Brian...agreed.

Back to the OP...

Isn't it weird how we continuely have the same experience, just in different decades/eras?  Whether is be technology, playing conditions, whatever...the same things over and over. 
Sportsman/Adventure loving golfer.

Rick Shefchik

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: An Interesting HWW Quote
« Reply #3 on: February 22, 2012, 03:39:30 PM »
Okay, put me down as a fan of turgid.

I don't always understand what certain celebrated writers are trying to say, but I clearly understood that sentence. Wind's appreciation for the aesthetics of Olympic is one of the reasons I'm looking forward to the Open this year.

Then again, Olympic can look as wild and tough as the USGA wants it, green or not:

"Golf is 20 percent mechanics and technique. The other 80 percent is philosophy, humor, tragedy, romance, melodrama, companionship, camaraderie, cussedness and conversation." - Grantland Rice

David_Tepper

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: An Interesting HWW Quote
« Reply #4 on: February 22, 2012, 06:17:44 PM »
Sean -

I think you are reading a little too much into HWH comments. I think his comments were likely just a reaction to his experiences at the US Opens of the prior few years rather than a general  comment on the proper "maintenance meld" for golf courses.

The 1964 US Open at Congressional was brutally hot. I don't know for sure, but I am guessing the 1965 US Open at Bellrive in St. Louis was more than a little warm as well.

As you probably know, the summer weather is San Francisco is very mild. Golf courses are never sun-baked or even sun burnt. Visitors to San Francisco in the summer months are regularly (and pleasantly) surprised with just how cool and refreshing the weather can be.

Rick S. -

It should be noted that the picture of Ben Hogan in the rough on #18 at Olympic is from the 1955 US Open, not the 1966 US Open.

DT

Rick Shefchik

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: An Interesting HWW Quote
« Reply #5 on: February 23, 2012, 10:23:01 AM »
Sean -

I think you are reading a little too much into HWH comments. I think his comments were likely just a reaction to his experiences at the US Opens of the prior few years rather than a general  comment on the proper "maintenance meld" for golf courses.

The 1964 US Open at Congressional was brutally hot. I don't know for sure, but I am guessing the 1965 US Open at Bellrive in St. Louis was more than a little warm as well.

As you probably know, the summer weather is San Francisco is very mild. Golf courses are never sun-baked or even sun burnt. Visitors to San Francisco in the summer months are regularly (and pleasantly) surprised with just how cool and refreshing the weather can be.

Rick S. -

It should be noted that the picture of Ben Hogan in the rough on #18 at Olympic is from the 1955 US Open, not the 1966 US Open.

DT

David,

I knew that. Figured everyone else would know that, too.
"Golf is 20 percent mechanics and technique. The other 80 percent is philosophy, humor, tragedy, romance, melodrama, companionship, camaraderie, cussedness and conversation." - Grantland Rice

David_Tepper

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: An Interesting HWW Quote
« Reply #6 on: February 23, 2012, 10:28:48 AM »
Rick -

I was pretty sure you did, but others might not have known.

DT

Joel_Stewart

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: An Interesting HWW Quote
« Reply #7 on: February 23, 2012, 11:14:03 AM »
Okay, put me down as a fan of turgid.

I don't always understand what certain celebrated writers are trying to say, but I clearly understood that sentence. Wind's appreciation for the aesthetics of Olympic is one of the reasons I'm looking forward to the Open this year.

Then again, Olympic can look as wild and tough as the USGA wants it, green or not:



This photo changed history to a certain extent.  This was 1955 and at the time, the clubs controlled the conditioning and course set up for the US Open.  When the USGA saw this, they took control of the conditioning and set up, starting in 1956.

Dan Kelly

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: An Interesting HWW Quote
« Reply #8 on: February 23, 2012, 11:24:26 AM »
That sentence is too long....

You're right.

It's one word too long. Some editor should have deleted "aesthetic." (It's redundant. What other sorts of eyesores are there?)

But other than that, it's unimpeachable.

What is the proper length of a sentence?

How high is the sky?

Dan

P.S., in case my point is lost on the same people who thought that picture of Hogan was from the '66 U.S. Open:

There is nothing wrong with a long sentence, if the long sentence achieves what it set out to achieve.
« Last Edit: February 23, 2012, 11:26:40 AM by Dan Kelly »
"There's no money in doing less." -- Joe Hancock, 11/25/2010
"Rankings are silly and subjective..." -- Tom Doak, 3/12/2016

Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back