News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #225 on: November 17, 2011, 08:05:28 PM »
If I owned a club in some remote area that was perfect for golf like the sand hills, I don't need a universe of people; I just need a couple hundred who want to be a part of something very cool. Playing golf has never really made any business sense has it?

I've always loved the game, so in that way maybe I have romantic ideas, but I'm very much a pragmatist about how golf courses should be operated, no matter where they are located.

Working at Dismal River has given me the opportunity to see some of the greatest golfing land in the world. Most people will never get it, and would never spend the time getting there or the money to join a club out in the middle of no where. But, if great golf stirs your soul, then sometimes you leave your accountant out of the conversation. 
 

Well said, Don.

As to Lou:  You may be correct that it would be crazy to develop a new property in the Sand Hills region today.  But, Ballyneal is already there, and the bottom line is that it will thrive when the debt is written down to a small fraction of what's there now.  I'm not sure if they have ever operated in the black for a year, but they certainly could, if they didn't have to find some way to pay down the debt.  That day will come, it's just a matter of how fast the creditors come to understand it.

David Lott

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #226 on: November 17, 2011, 08:29:30 PM »
"You guys need to take a deep breath and sit back.  Somebody will work this out and I would bet they would welcome the former members in a second."

Yep. The right price is there. It will take a little work to find it.
David Lott

Dan Byrnes

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #227 on: November 17, 2011, 09:14:02 PM »
While I enjoy talking about the business and have a bit of experience in it, I want nothing but the best for the place.  It sounds wonderful.  Hopefully a plan will come to fruition that allows the place to thrive.  While I am on the east coast I am a CU grad and love Colorado and would consider a membership if the economics where affordable to me.  Sounds like a place any avid golfer would love.

Dan

Patrick_Mucci

Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #228 on: November 17, 2011, 09:47:03 PM »
Tom Doak,

I think the ultimate success of Ballyneal may be determined by the eventual owner and whether he/they are in it for the profit or for the passion.

Clubs that were the product of passion seem to fare better than those that were the product of profit.

Chris Johnston

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #229 on: November 17, 2011, 10:01:02 PM »
Don, Tom, and all who wish for the best for a great place in a great place...Right On! 


John Mayhugh

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #230 on: November 17, 2011, 10:29:25 PM »
The destination golf model is alive and well and those who make the choice are pleased to have done so.  At Dismal, we don't charge an arm and a leg to join, and our dues are probably alot less than your home club, and we will have two of the best courses, lodging and culinary in the business.  It works but it ain't easy.  We have happy members, most of whom are big fans and, dare I say, friends.  It isn't hard to get to a handful of times a year, and thats what they were built to serve.  These aren't national membership clubs, they are national destination clubs.  A different animal entirely.

I would caution against members buying the club.  There is a huge difference between being a member and being an owner - just ask the good men who were part of Dismal V2.  Ownership is a million details.  If the deal was fair to both the lender, members, we would love to have a look if we are welcome by all involved.  Ballyneal has great people and great members - thats a recipe for success but I can assure you, nobody will make a killing. This is a labor of love and love of the game.  

No offense Chris, but for once can we have a conversation on this board that doesn't turn into a blaring neon advertisement for Dismal River.

Sorry, Sven.  My post was in support of Ballyneal and had little to do with Dismal.  If you don't like my posts, I recommend you choose not to read them...just pass them over.  If you don't like Dismal, feel free not to come out.  I share information when I think I can contribute to a topic.  

Chris, a couple of questions if I may:

Isn't the first paragraph you quoted promoting Dismal River?  You have every right to be proud of your club, but can't you see how people might find praising the merits of your own club off-putting when it's done on a thread about financial issues at a different club?

What did you mean by the "if the deal was fair" comment in the second paragraph?  I want to be sure I don't misunderstand.

Thanks

Chris Johnston

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #231 on: November 17, 2011, 10:50:02 PM »
Hi John

Nope.  I was merely pointing out what has been mentioned elsewhere in the thread - today, value sells.  High costs don't work real well these days - Dismal was but an example where I have first hand knowledge to share.  Others have pointed out seperate examples here and in the national club thread.  Ballyneal is unbelievably good but we have learned even the very best can't escape current economic reality.  The business is tough today, for everyone.  My intent was not to promote, it was to support.  I like the guys at Ballyneal.

wrt to "fair" - the members have done a ton to help build the club and shouldn't be washed away in a foreclosure.  As an acquisitions guy, I believe a deal must be fair to the owner(s), the members, and any other constituents, if any.  A good deal is one where everyone has a chance to win and/or benefit.  While I won't talk about DR as it apparently offends some thinner skins here, all parties were treated in this manner when we stepped in.  It was a win-win.  Simply I believe this is the best path and a worthy goal.  I'm sure you agree.

John Mayhugh

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #232 on: November 17, 2011, 11:05:24 PM »
Chris,
Thanks for the clarification. Your "fair" sentence in the second paragraph sounded like you were offering to buy Ballyneal, but I guess you were just offering your thoughts on how the groups should interact. Sorry for misunderstanding.

You're right that other people have offered up examples in the national club thread, but it feels different to me since that's not a thread about the situation at Ballyneal.  I don't doubt your intentions at all, but it just doesn't seem right to see this sort of comment on this particular thread (no matter how well-meaning the intent).
At Dismal, we don't charge an arm and a leg to join, and our dues are probably alot less than your home club, and we will have two of the best courses, lodging and culinary in the business.  It works but it ain't easy.  We have happy members, most of whom are big fans and, dare I say, friends

Thanks again for clarifying your intentions.  So easy to misunderstand people in this sort of medium.

Chip Gaskins

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #233 on: November 17, 2011, 11:13:34 PM »
I think the ultimate success of Ballyneal may be determined by the eventual owner and whether he/they are in it for the profit or for the passion.

BINGO.  There are good investments with our hard earned money and then there impassioned hobbies.  They are different endeavors unless you are infinitely wealthy.

Chris Johnston

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #234 on: November 17, 2011, 11:43:57 PM »
Thanks, John!  I'm glad you get it.

Brad Isaacs

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #235 on: November 18, 2011, 12:38:12 AM »
I have not seen info about Forrest Dunes.  THey dont have any bloggers?

Duncan Cheslett

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #236 on: November 18, 2011, 01:54:25 AM »
 Ballyneal is already there, and the bottom line is that it will thrive when the debt is written down to a small fraction of what's there now.  I'm not sure if they have ever operated in the black for a year, but they certainly could, if they didn't have to find some way to pay down the debt.  That day will come, it's just a matter of how fast the creditors come to understand it.

Exactly.

As with any infrastructure project, it is servicing the debt incurred to build the thing that can cripple the ongoing business. Take the debt away - as happens in a bankruptcy - and whoever buys the asset at a fraction of what it cost to build will have a much better chance of making the new business model work.

As Tom says, sooner or later the creditors have to realise that their money is gone...





« Last Edit: November 18, 2011, 01:56:11 AM by Duncan Cheslett »

Scott Warren

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #237 on: November 18, 2011, 03:00:12 AM »
Sven, John: I thought the same thing when I read that. Good to see the above exchange clarifying.

It is somewhat unsettling (for want of a better word) reading sentiments this week re: Ballyneal saying "it must be saved", "golf needs Ballyneal" etc from some people who to the best of my knowledge do not belong to a golf club. At the risk of agreeing with John Kavanaugh (;)), if you're not part of the solution, you might be part of the problem.
« Last Edit: November 18, 2011, 05:55:55 AM by Scott Warren »

JC Jones

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #238 on: November 18, 2011, 06:27:18 AM »
I have not seen info about Forrest Dunes.  THey dont have any bloggers?
[/quote

There were definitely threads on both Forest Dunes and Lochenheath.  Financials were certainly discussed.

You're right in that not nearly as many people cared and also, nobody had problems with the discussion or speculation. 
I get it, you are mad at the world because you are an adult caddie and few people take you seriously.

Excellent spellers usually lack any vision or common sense.

I know plenty of courses that are in the red, and they are killing it.

Ben Sims

  • Karma: +1/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #239 on: November 18, 2011, 08:47:46 AM »
Sven, John: I thought the same thing when I read that. Good to see the above exchange clarifying.

It is somewhat unsettling (for want of a better word) reading sentiments this week re: Ballyneal saying "it must be saved", "golf needs Ballyneal" etc from some people who to the best of my knowledge do not belong to a golf club. At the risk of agreeing with John Kavanaugh (;)), if you're not part of the solution, you might be part of the problem.

Scott,

I don't think you need to be a member of a club to understand that Ballyneal is a special golf course and should continue to operate.  Long before I had any ability to join a golf club, I knew it was important to golf architecture.  Some paintings are better and more valuable (in every sense of the word) than others.  Ballyneal is one of those special pieces of work. 

Jimmy Chandler

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #240 on: November 18, 2011, 09:11:18 AM »
Sven, John: I thought the same thing when I read that. Good to see the above exchange clarifying.

It is somewhat unsettling (for want of a better word) reading sentiments this week re: Ballyneal saying "it must be saved", "golf needs Ballyneal" etc from some people who to the best of my knowledge do not belong to a golf club. At the risk of agreeing with John Kavanaugh (;)), if you're not part of the solution, you might be part of the problem.

So if I don't have enough wealth/income to join Ballyneal or other private clubs, I am part of the problem? This is one of the more ridiculous statements I have ever seen on this discussion forum.

I had the honor and pleasure of playing at the inaugural Yucca Cup at Ballyneal last summer, due to Jim Colton's generosity. Easily the most enjoyable time I have ever had playing golf, due to the people attending the event, the hospitality of Ballyneal's employees, and the amazing golf course. I feel that if Ballyneal were closed it would be a great loss, but I do not worry that this will happen.

I won't speculate on how this situation will resolve, and I have no insight into these financial matters anyhow, especially compared to many people on this forum who have far more expertise than I. But I do take exception to your statement that I am somehow part of the problem because I am a public golfer.

George Pazin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #241 on: November 18, 2011, 09:53:43 AM »
This site would be a whole lot less interesting if people directly involved in the industry didn't share their experiences. Please don't anyone try to encourage people to share less. If you aren't interested, ignore it and let the rest of us continue to enjoy it.

Sean, though we haven't met - and I haven't met Dan or Bogey either - I certainly can understand when someone is joking. Dan is one of the nicest, most considerate people on this site. Maybe he should have just emailed me the poster; that would have been the safer thing to do. But then anyone who saw it and laughed would have missed out. Context - particularly with respect to the poster - matters greatly.
Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04

Jerry Kluger

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #242 on: November 18, 2011, 10:14:22 AM »
Let's all agree that Ballyneal is a great golf course and we are all optimistic that it will survive.

Concerning the finances of the club we have no idea how much it cost to build, how much debt there is, how much it costs to operate, how many rounds are played, etc. so why are we going off in all directions giving opinions with respect to how it can survive? 

Mike Hendren

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #243 on: November 18, 2011, 10:23:24 AM »
Sean, though we haven't met - and I haven't met Dan or Bogey either - I certainly can understand when someone is joking. Dan is one of the nicest, most considerate people on this site.

George, so where does that leave me? ;)

Bogey
Two Corinthians walk into a bar ....

Harris Nepon

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #244 on: November 18, 2011, 10:29:16 AM »
Is it possible that Ballyneal could thrive if it didn't price itself out of the young generation? IMO Ballyneal is the anti uber-private golf club but still a world class golf course. The laid back attitude and casual feel of Ballyneal is what made me fall in love with Ballyneal. This atmosphere, I would guess, is what younger people want from golf. All the greatness of golf and a great course without all the “rules”.

That being said, as a young professional 70K at this point is well beyond my means, and in this economy I would guess I’m in the majority. Would it be so bad if Ballyneal kept the basic model it has as a destination course but allow a younger generation to actually look at joining with a lower initiation and dues? Along the lines of Pat Mucci's proposal? Would more members really taint this place? I don't think so, but the world of national/destination memberships is lost on me as I don't/can't have one at this time. Hopefully in a few years I will have a better idea, meaning I'll somehow be a member of Ballyneal.

I know Ballyneal will be just fine one way or another. Its way to freaking good not to

George Pazin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #245 on: November 18, 2011, 10:37:54 AM »
Sean, though we haven't met - and I haven't met Dan or Bogey either - I certainly can understand when someone is joking. Dan is one of the nicest, most considerate people on this site.

George, so where does that leave me? ;)

Bogey


 :) Sadly, with me.
Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04

Sean Leary

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #246 on: November 18, 2011, 10:40:26 AM »
Harris,

But the question is how many more members? There is only so much room to put people and with a short season, weekends could get booked very quick.

I know of one member who couldn't go two different times this year because the club was full. Imagine if there are hundreds of members and they can send unescorted guests.

That doesn't work either.

Lou_Duran

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #247 on: November 18, 2011, 11:10:30 AM »
If I owned a club in some remote area that was perfect for golf like the sand hills, I don't need a universe of people; I just need a couple hundred who want to be a part of something very cool. Playing golf has never really made any business sense has it?

I've always loved the game, so in that way maybe I have romantic ideas, but I'm very much a pragmatist about how golf courses should be operated, no matter where they are located.

Working at Dismal River has given me the opportunity to see some of the greatest golfing land in the world. Most people will never get it, and would never spend the time getting there or the money to join a club out in the middle of no where. But, if great golf stirs your soul, then sometimes you leave your accountant out of the conversation.  
 

Well said, Don.

As to Lou:  You may be correct that it would be crazy to develop a new property in the Sand Hills region today.  But, Ballyneal is already there, and the bottom line is that it will thrive when the debt is written down to a small fraction of what's there now.  I'm not sure if they have ever operated in the black for a year, but they certainly could, if they didn't have to find some way to pay down the debt.  That day will come, it's just a matter of how fast the creditors come to understand it.

Now, Don, are you calling me a bean counter ????   ;)  (Ok, I'll fess up, I was a CMA for a few years during my days in the corp. world, but I was primarily a strategy and financial guy.)  My point is that clubs of this type, even really, really good ones, have a rather thin market, i.e. there are relatively few people in a sport that's for the most part declining in both participation and, reportedly, intensity (my own term for rounds played by core golfers) who would fork-up relatively big money for even a hugely spiritually satisfying experience.  While we have many simpaticos on this site who would on occasion wander to the middle of nowhere (no disrespect to the sand belt area) for golf, I suspect that we're a very unrepresentative sample.  It is not just you looking for a "couple hundred", but you, Chris, Dick, and perhaps quite a few others with equal passion.

Concering love and romance, unfortunately, it is not just about operating the course that's the issue here.  There are those nasty but necessary capital costs to build and then support the infrastructure as a going concern.  Passion does come into play here and I suspect that the type of courses we're talking about require multiple doses of that.

In one of today's papers, George Will quotes Thomas Sowell- "The first lesson of economics is scarcity.  There is never enough of anything to fully satisfy all those who want it. The first lesson of politics is to disregard the first lesson of economics".  Whether we are talking about the bigger problems of the U.S. economy or the golf industry, money is scarce and there aren't too many folks who will WILLINGLY fund deficits out of their pocket primarily for the benefit of others.  Unfortunately for the industry, unlike Big Brother, golf course owners don't have the power to compel a relative few to dig deeper into their pockets to satisfy the desires of much larger numbers (or the latter to buy memberships and/or pay green fees).

Tom D,

Where did I suggest that someone would be crazy to develop a new property anywhere?   What people do with their own money is their business.  It would be nuts (and an impossibility) for me to build a new course, but for Don's partner or someone who might otherwise build a $50 Million house, why not?

I fully agree that the capital investments put into Ballyneal are essentially sunk costs.  The question is what capital structure can be supported by the property as a golf course vs. the alternative use of the land.  Can an operator like Don run the course in a manner that generates sufficient revenues to cover operating expenses and capital improvements?  Are there enough "passionate" golfers who will put up the necessary investment and working capital to then acquire the property out of foreclosure?

From the reports of the course from Adam Clayman and others whose opinions I trust, I have no doubt that Ballyneal is a great course.  I am very interested in these answers.  

Chris J,

Take no offense.  Keep posting.  I've read nothing unseemly or improper in your comments.  I hope your efforts at DR are properly rewarded.
« Last Edit: November 18, 2011, 11:23:29 AM by Lou_Duran »

Don_Mahaffey

Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #248 on: November 18, 2011, 12:42:52 PM »
Lou, to be completely frank, I find you questioning me about my involvement at Dismal River out of line,  as is your comment about my partner and a $50 million dollar house. I'm the same guy I've always been and I'm not sure where you’re going with that sort of dialog.

Last week I called Patrick Mucci a master of the obvious and he called me testy. Can we all agree that developing a golf course in a remote area may be a challenging business model? I don't think I've ever read so many smart guys find so many different ways to try and justify that it’s a tough deal. Quite sure that all involved deduced it was a tough deal long before the first shovel went into the ground.

It is my belief, and always had been, that just because there is no guarantee, and even though the finance types in the world may say you’re nuts, some ideas are still worth chasing.

George Pazin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Ballyneal in foreclosure
« Reply #249 on: November 18, 2011, 12:54:13 PM »
Last week I called Patrick Mucci a master of the obvious and he called me testy. Can we all agree that developing a golf course in a remote area may be a challenging business model? I don't think I've ever read so many smart guys find so many different ways to try and justify that it’s a tough deal. Quite sure that all involved deduced it was a tough deal long before the first shovel went into the ground.

It is my belief, and always had been, that just because there is no guarantee, and even though the finance types in the world may say you’re nuts, some ideas are still worth chasing.


Love it.

As you may have overlooked, one of the worst qualities of smart people is that they think they know everything - especially about everyone else's life and work. Although, I don't think that is what Lou's doing, he's simply trying to reconcile your romantic side with your practical side. He's forgetting that there's more than one side to most of us! :)

You couldn't be more right about the dream aspect of golf. And that's true of many businesses, if you think about it. There are a lot of "easier" ways to make money than to open a restaurant, yet the world is littered with attempts, failed and successful. And running a restaurant is far from easy, kind of like a golf course.

I can honestly say my accountant relishes my decision to follow my dream. Now my wife, on the other hand...

Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04