I enjoy a "Most Fun" list more than most people, but I got pretty bored seeing North Berwick on every other post in that thread
For more excitement, how about listing the courses on which you've had the least amount of fun. This has to be related to the ARCHITECTURE. It has nothing to do with pace of play, what you shot, or how poor the beer selection was. It's all about the GCA on this one.
Mine? I'll pick three:
Cyprian Keyes in Massachusetts. Though Mark Mungeam is a competent architecture, this is one of those courses that never should have been built. It is filled with rock outcroppings and environmentally-sensitive wetlands area, Cyprian is a 300-acre penalty drop. The thrill factor is high in places, but there is way too much encroaching hazard to give golfers a chance at enjoying their game there.
Hunters Ridge in Bonita Springs, Florida. This area between Fort Myers and Naples is filled with the prototypical housing community golf course: water left, house right, no fun of any kind. Hunters takes the cake with all of them. It has water in play on 17 holes, houses or expressway in play on 18 holes, two island greens, several hidden water hazards, six or seven 90-degree doglegs, but, somehow, no good golf holes. Playing this course at age 12 was no fun, and I can't imagine it being more fun now.
Oak Hill (East), Rochester, New York. Sort of a controversial choice, since it falls well within the top 100 and is also one of my home courses. For all of the solid golf holes out there, this course is flat out miserable to play. It beats you up from the first hole, which a long par four bring trees, out of bounds, and a creek into play. Every full shot demands perfect execution. A shot hit into the rough and trees (one in the same on most holes) will result in a lengthy golf ball search, slow play, and a ruined round. The Fuzio renovations don't help the cause either.