Okay...Rees Jones doesn't call out any by name but i am guessing he is talking about Doak and Coore and Crenshaw. Perhaps more the second since they redid #2, which Jones had previously redone. In the June issue of Golf Magazine there is an article on Jones as the Open Doctor. Here is a quote from the article:
"Jones, while agreeing that he's a strategic designer, asks why a tournament venue would hire an architect who wasn't. "Today's middle-aged achitects are really into aesthetics," he says, taking a shot at the naturalist trend in course design. "They love their wilderness bunkers, which tend to be expensive to build, hard to maintain, and difficult to play out of." An Open Doctor, on the other hand, must maintain playability and enjoyment for the club members while toughening up the course for the pros."
I have played Pinehurst #2 many times - before Jones touched it, after Jones worked on it, and since Coore and Crenshaw did their thing.the course was more playable before Jones' work and much more playable than it ever has been since Coore and Crenshaw worked on it. How is putting 28 yard wide fairways on #2 more strategic and more playable for the members? And #2 was the least enjoyable in my 20 plus years playing it during the Jones rework.