I can't help but think this is almost entirely sour grapes. This topic comes up every year, but I rarely see mentioned the fact that he had his chance to win there
BEFORE they made all the "awful" changes, but he never could. So all this course bashing in retrospect looks very suspect. And so in his words, the course is not "great" because he couldn't figure it out.
This is just me.... but no sympathy here for Trevino or his "thoughts" on ANGC.
P.S. "“I ask people to name me a great hole at Augusta,” Trevino said. “Number three and number 12, that’s it. Great tournament, great venue, great history. But it’s not a great course.”
So I guess #13, arguably the greatest par 5 on the planet, is dog meat?