Mike (S)
An interesting topic, but all stems upon our definition of Golf.
I am certain it will include your friend Anthony but I also believe that Mike also makes a very valid point with his list and I suspect many more besides.
You go on to say “I think sometimes we get lost around here with “the old days” “old dead guys” and similar concepts” However is it not down to the old days and the old dead guys that so much interest has been generated in GCA not just Golf.
Then whilst on the subject of Golf what sub-section of Golf are you referring to? Are we looking at the game as it is played worldwide or just in America perhaps even GB&I. With in that subsection are you leading with The Majors style of Golf (Walking) or that played by the majority of your fellow countrymen (using carts and aids).
I think the game will be in safe hands if we had a singular game, the basics of the rules being followed and the course etiquette being upheld by all.
I think the game will be in safe hands when it is redefined as to what game are we all playing and so enable our golf courses for once to reflect stability in design.
I think the game would be in safe hands when our Governing Bodies start to listen and understand the feeling of the golfers whose interests they are meant to be protecting and maintaining (that’s a joke).
You go on to say “I have hosted and played with a bunch of guys around here and Anthony is an example of why the game is great. Good shots, bad shots, friends, chili and beers on the porch of The Orchards” but is that not what happens in most parts of the world (perhaps without the chilli), the friendship and enjoyment of sharing great/poor and sometimes unbelievable shots again not necessary on the porch but indoors on a cool summers evening.
I think the game of Golf will soon need to re-establish its priorities and define its core aims and objectives if it is to remain united. Or are we going to see The World Series of American Golf in America; The GB,I & EU Walking Open Series throughout Europe with the rest of the world considering to do their own thing or follow one of the others
I think the Game needs direction and a consistent stewardship inspired by the golfers, certainly not the officials or pros. With that we may again see a Second or is that a Third Golden Age of Golf Course Architecture based upon a uniformity of design.
Alas IMHO we will never see this third Golden Age as our officials see themselves as the Master of Golf and believe they have all the answers – i.e. do as little as you need to and do not detract from counting the money first. All for One and One for All, well as long as all the money goes to the Governing Bodies and their associates.
So I wish Anthony, Luis, Huang, Pedro, Tyrone, Nikolai, Phong, Rakesh, Zakarya, Motumbo and all the others the best for the future. They may well be the ones in their old age that finally has to sort out the mess. Or perhaps you just do not see Golf about to enter an identity crisis due to the poor management. After the Banks should we even be surprised?
Melvyn
PS Long Live The Old Guys;
Long Live the Memory of the Old Dead Guys;
and Finally Long Live Traditional Golf