Jeff Warne,
The golf course was NOT remodeled 3 times in 15 years.
In fact, it's yet to be remodeled, with the exception of a tee that turned out to be on property not owned by the club, causing the hole to have the tee shortened and the hole reclassified as a par 4 from a par 5.
It is now the fantastic 12th hole.
This also caused # 10 to be transitioned to a par 5 from a par 4, due to the club's desire to retain par 72. As a par 5 it had its green altered. That alteration no longer exists.
It now plays as both a par 4 and par 5
The course is essentially the same today as it was when it opened, circa 1961+. Some contouring has been lost in # 3 and # 9 green.
Where did you come up with the idea that the course was remodeled three times ?
Uh, Pat,
Crazy me.
two of the three architects listed in the Golf Digest (which someone else posted and I reposted)
list Pine Tree on their websites as courses they "restored" (1997 Ron Forse)-which I presume restored what Joe Lee "remodeled" in 1990
or "redesigned" ( Bobby Weed 2005)
I guess someone will "restore" (since 2005 is called a redesign) it soon and the cycle will continue
Should someone mention to the architects that it's never been remodeled/restored/redesigned?
because they seem to think so and list it on their sites.
I'll bet when the club paid their architect fees they felt something had been done.
I've never been there, but somebody's felt the need to bring in multiple architects(although 1990's architect du jour was part of the original team).
Must've been seamless if you didn't notice
Pat,
I have no beef with Pine Tree or you--
I was just having a little fun
I'm sensing an onslaught of green ink
Pine Tree's slide down the list and multiple architect's "involvement" does point out how tastes and styles fall out of favor with raters (and perhaps green committee members)
By all accounts Pine Tree was/is a great place