News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


DMoriarty

  • Karma: +0/-0

Dave M,

Well, it's hardly specific to Chip. I'd say that's a "green light" shot to a huge range of players. Even a bogey golfer who bunts the ball around like I do (and lefty to boot) would only have to play a moderately conservative 7-iron short and well right in that circumstance (which BTW I could only experience for a third shot, not being able to drive it anywhere near that far from even the member's tees I'm sure).

Brent.  Your short-right seven iron exactly makes my point.   This is not one-shot-fits-all architecture.   For most golfers Shivas and Chip might as well be speaking Swahili when they start talking about how the only shot is "the old high, spinning wedge shot with a slight draw and ground hook spin aimed at the left center of the right bunker, with as much spin as possible drawing it back to the the left.
Golf history can be quite interesting if you just let your favorite legends go and allow the truth to take you where it will.
--Tom MacWood (1958-2012)

Kalen Braley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Why can't a bad result be simply explained by poor execution!!

It's not a matter of explaining it - it's a matter of addressing the supposed demands of a shot. As I said repeatedly, I'm not questioning his decision or even execution, I am questioning the approach and its implications for architecture.

George,

I wasn't trying to single anyone out, but more trying to make the point that even the best, most well thought out pre-shot plans can go awful if one doesn't execute.

In this case, it sounds like Chip had a good plan, and just hit a poor shot as he explained.  I'm sure any other well thought out plan of attack could have just as easily resulted in a watery grave as well, unless playing ultra-conservative and aiming for the fringe right of the green.

Chip Gaskins

  • Karma: +0/-0
There are a lot of adjectives in this quote: "the old high, spinning wedge shot with a slight draw and ground hook spin aimed at the left center of the right bunker, with as much spin as possible drawing it back to the the left."

I would also describe this shot as a standard wedge from the middle of the fairway to the middle of the green.  That seems like something a high handicapper could do?  no?  it certainly sounds easier that some running 7 iron that flies 70 yards, land 40 yards short of the green, traverses three tall mounds and trickles onto a 13 speed green.  but to each his own.

George Pazin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Giving up.

People wonder why architectural threads tend to die on the vine.
Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04

DMoriarty

  • Karma: +0/-0
DMoriarty-

Dude, why the hostility toward me.?  Where did I say anything about when YOU should or should not putt.  I was making general statements about the conditions and why putting IMO would be a very bad decision (and listed all the reasons why).  If you think you can putt that ball close to pin, be my guest, give it a go, but given I have never seen ANYONE for 25 years of watching the Masters (in person and on TV) try and putt from that location, including Seve, Crenshaw, etc I assume (though I didn't say it in my posts) you specifically couldn't do it either.  Maybe you can?

Listen I am not about trying to make things harder than they should be...it was a freakin 130 yard shot in the center of the fairway to a benign pin.  I hit the shot I thought I could get closest and I pulled it a few yards and made 7.  Faced with that shot again, I do the same thing 10 out of 10 times.  I just hit a bad shot.  I must just not be smart enough or good enough to have the imagination to try the running shot when the situation doesn't call for it.

What in the world is a octogenarians anyway?

Chip,  no hostility meant at all.  Sorry if I gave you the impression that I was at all taking this discussion seriously or personally.  I tend to be flippant and glib around Shivas, who is an idiot, so maybe that explains it. 

Also, as I said above, I am not sure I would putt in that situation.   I just brought it up as an extreme example of the variety of possibilities presented to golfers who might find themselves in this particular situation.     It sure looks like a fun putt though.

My questions and comments have been intended to point out that while you and others are writing generally, you appear to be considering only a certain type of player and an certain skill level when assessing the best way to play that hole.    That is not the way quality architecture works.

When I play a hole, all I have is my own game to work with, same as you.  I cannot necessarily dial up the shot you or Shivas might think is proper.   I sometimes have to do some pretty unconventional things,  and I have putted from from some places that I am sure would seem insane for many golfers, with varying degrees of success.   But I'd bet that for me when I seriously (as opposed to practicing or screwing around) go with putter from long range that it is probably the odds-on best decision for me.   

I enjoyed what I saw of the  British Open in part because of how comfortable Harrington seemed while hitting shots that one would never see on the PGA Tour.    He was not held by the mindset that seems to grip so many American golfers.  Especially good ones. 

An octogenarian is 80-something years old. 

There are a lot of adjectives in this quote: "the old high, spinning wedge shot with a slight draw and ground hook spin aimed at the left center of the right bunker, with as much spin as possible drawing it back to the the left."

I would also describe this shot as a standard wedge from the middle of the fairway to the middle of the green.  That seems like something a high handicapper could do?  no?  it certainly sounds easier that some running 7 iron that flies 70 yards, land 40 yards short of the green, traverses three tall mounds and trickles onto a 13 speed green.  but to each his own.

No.  From the picture and description it doesn't seem easier to me.   With a hanging fade lie and that shaved bank, I'll stick as close to the ground as I can, thank you.   

The quote was Shivas' description of how to play the hole.     
« Last Edit: July 30, 2008, 05:01:41 PM by DMoriarty »
Golf history can be quite interesting if you just let your favorite legends go and allow the truth to take you where it will.
--Tom MacWood (1958-2012)

Adam Clayman

  • Karma: +0/-0
I must just not be smart enough or good enough to have the imagination to try the running shot when the situation doesn't call for it.


See those humps well short and on the right?

To say this HOLE precludes a bump and run have got to be the saddest words ever written.


"It's unbelievable how much you don't know about the game you've been playing your whole life." - Mickey Mantle

Phil Benedict

  • Karma: +0/-0
My recall of the hole is that it flattens out the closer you get to the greens, so using the humps to propel the ball forward is problematical at best.

DMoriarty

  • Karma: +0/-0
Perhaps it's just me, but I have found over the years that landing shots on downslopes is an excellent way to numerically maximize one's score. 



Maybe you should try landing on downslopes which are short of your intended target.   Miraculously, the ball tends to go forward.
Golf history can be quite interesting if you just let your favorite legends go and allow the truth to take you where it will.
--Tom MacWood (1958-2012)

Mike Benham

  • Karma: +0/-0

the better players are more one dimensional because that one dimension WORKS! 



or more specifically, "... because that one dimension is repeatable and predictable"
"... and I liked the guy ..."

Chip Gaskins

  • Karma: +0/-0
this will be my last post on this, but i just found the whole series that produced the 7 on #11.  it shows a larger picture of the mounds to the right of the green and the impossible drop shot.  anyway you add it up, i hit a slightly pulled 9 iron that spun left and back into the water and lead to crappy 7.  hey, at least i got to see how the wind messed with the tee shots of 3 guys hitting before me on #12 tee.

actually looking at the pictures i can see that the mounds on the front right don't look nearly as big as they play.

and no, i don't have that many pictures of the round...the guy i was playing with just broke his camera out on 11 and after he made a 9 on 12 he put his camera back in his bag.

This is green light time!


Wedge or 9 Iron?


It sure looked good in the air!


Standing over the drop and laughing with the caddie about how hard the shot is..


I am trying to nip it and spin it as much as possible to clear the water but hold the green
« Last Edit: July 30, 2008, 07:47:08 PM by Chip Gaskins »

Kirk Gill

  • Karma: +0/-0
Chip, it's been most interesting reading about how you played this course. An uncommon privelege for me to read.

That said, what's your feeling on the original question of this thread - How would an architectural numbskull think, or not, his way around the course?   ;)
"After all, we're not communists."
                             -Don Barzini

Chip Gaskins

  • Karma: +0/-0
Kirk-

Well hopefully you are not saying I am a numbskull as I think I have added numerous thoughtful comments on how exactly how ANGC plays on a day to day basis...but I am putting my kids to bed and will log in later to give a download from a "numbskull" basis.

Chip-

Kirk Gill

  • Karma: +0/-0
Chip, perhaps I wasn't clear.

I've read how you played the course, and I really enjoyed it. But you aren't a numbskull. That's why I feel like the question hasn't been answered. My own feeling is that an architectural numbskull would play the course scared. Maybe not off the tee, but certainly on and around those greens !
"After all, we're not communists."
                             -Don Barzini

Tim Bert

  • Karma: +0/-0

I did know about your go at 16 at CPC, but you are in good company, there are other GCA'ers who have taken that route as well!!   ;D

I heard from a respected source that the shot was "exhilarating."  Well, maybe not so much, but there's something to be said for sticking to one's plan and accomplishing one's goals.

Kalen Braley

  • Karma: +0/-0

I did know about your go at 16 at CPC, but you are in good company, there are other GCA'ers who have taken that route as well!!   ;D

I heard from a respected source that the shot was "exhilarating."  Well, maybe not so much, but there's something to be said for sticking to one's plan and accomplishing one's goals.


Tim,

You are indeed a man with a plan, which is more that I can say for myself!!   ;D

And as far as layups go, the one at 16 is certainly one of most exhilirating that I can think of!!

DMoriarty

  • Karma: +0/-0

I did know about your go at 16 at CPC, but you are in good company, there are other GCA'ers who have taken that route as well!!   ;D

I heard from a respected source that the shot was "exhilarating."  Well, maybe not so much, but there's something to be said for sticking to one's plan and accomplishing one's goals.


For me the layup was indeed thrilling.  It is CPC 16, and just being there is a thrill in-and-of itself.   And it is a pretty exciting shot as layups go-- the ocean is still there, and so is the wind.  I shudder even now when I consider the grief I would have been given had I decided to lay up and then still dumped it into the ocean! 

Plus, there was something very exciting about playing one of the greatest holes on earth as intended-- considering the options, deciding the best one for the circumstances, and then successfully playing the shot.   

I am sure I will be further crucified for saying so, but I feel sorry for those who just go with the knee-jerk I didn't come all the way to CPC  16 to lay up! mentality.   This attitude greatly diminishes a large part of the thrill of the hole.

Golf history can be quite interesting if you just let your favorite legends go and allow the truth to take you where it will.
--Tom MacWood (1958-2012)

Brent Hutto

The day I played the sixteenth at Cypress Point the breeze was from the right and hurting. I think unless I caught a lull in the wind the carry was bordering on impossible for me even with a driver. Plus even after butchering fourteen I had just parred fifteen and was playing to my handicap or better (i.e. it felt like I was shooting a good score by my standards). So once I asked for and received the carry yardage the thought of going for it never crossed my mind.

At that point my all-consuming goal became to make a three on the hole one way or another. I hit a fairway wood to the absolute deepest part of the "fairway" which was not a trivial accomplishment because it was downwind. Then a beautiful punched 6-iron that started out at the right edge of the green and finished 10 feet from the hole. Our caddies gave me the read as right edge and get it to the hole with some pace on it. I did the former but not the latter and lipped out on the left side. One of the caddies said "you never gave it a chance" and that was that.

I found it a perfectly thrilling 15 minutes, even without visiting the beach below as one of my playing companions did.

DMoriarty

  • Karma: +0/-0
Brent, great story.  Much more interesting than, "The wind was howling but I figured I'll never be here again, so I grabbed a wood and smashed it into the rocks.  Three times."

On my first lay up there, I also punched a pretty good second and missed a makable par putt.  I'd much rather have made it, but it was exciting to have a chance at par the safe way. 

I was playing a match, and unfortunately lost the hole to par, but to a guy who also laid up.
Golf history can be quite interesting if you just let your favorite legends go and allow the truth to take you where it will.
--Tom MacWood (1958-2012)

BCowan

Great thread, needs to be bumped...

Joe Lane

  • Karma: +0/-0
As somebody who caddied at Augusta I can tell you at least some guys just want to hear the number to the pin. Which is kind of insane when you think about it, but nevertheless.


Most people, though, really got the message after hitting a couple of putts on the practice green. Then they look around at the greens they can see, realize how big some are, and get a clue, and if not usually by the second hole you could get them to see reason. And if they still haven’t gotten the message, usually the fifth green did the trick.


The most hilarious thing ever was when some prick wouldn’t listen on 14—and the ball would end up like 90 feet away with eight breaks between it and the cup. Five putts, or even worse, weren’t unheard of on that green.


Anyway, the thing about Augusta is that the green speeds are so absurdly off the charts—and seriously, I’ve seen ridiculously fast greens, but I’ve never seen anything like Augusta’s and I wasn’t even there in peak season—that any mistake was just instant crater. I’ve never seen a course that would just so instantaneously BURY a so-so shot. (Maybe Chicago Golf, especially the 10th hole, which I would say might be harder than Augusta’s 12th.)


Bottom line: Augusta is the golf capital of Schadenfreude.

cary lichtenstein

  • Karma: +0/-0
I played Augusta twice on consecutive days. First off, it doesn't look like it does during the tournament. Without people lining every fairway and green, it looks just like any golf course from the first tee.


Second, I was just trying to hit fairways and greens and I don't think I gave much thought to the architecture inspire of the fact that I had been there for 7 tournaments over the years.




I bailed out way right on my shots in the 11th green and hit 12 both times.I hit it too close to 15 and dumped it in the water, actually it made it across, but hit it thin and it trickled back in.


I 4 putted 17 as I hit my first putt too hard and had a 30 yard chip for my 2nd putt.


I shot 81/82 on my 2 rounds.


I liked the par 3 better maybe because it was just more fun.
Live Jupiter, Fl, was  4 handicap, played top 100 US, top 75 World. Great memories, no longer play, 4 back surgeries. I don't miss a lot of things about golf, life is simpler with out it. I miss my 60 degree wedge shots, don't miss nasty weather, icing, back spasms. Last course I played was Augusta

Tom Birkert

  • Karma: +0/-0
As somebody who caddied at Augusta I can tell you at least some guys just want to hear the number to the pin. Which is kind of insane when you think about it, but nevertheless.


Most people, though, really got the message after hitting a couple of putts on the practice green. Then they look around at the greens they can see, realize how big some are, and get a clue, and if not usually by the second hole you could get them to see reason. And if they still haven’t gotten the message, usually the fifth green did the trick.


The most hilarious thing ever was when some prick wouldn’t listen on 14—and the ball would end up like 90 feet away with eight breaks between it and the cup. Five putts, or even worse, weren’t unheard of on that green.


Anyway, the thing about Augusta is that the green speeds are so absurdly off the charts—and seriously, I’ve seen ridiculously fast greens, but I’ve never seen anything like Augusta’s and I wasn’t even there in peak season—that any mistake was just instant crater. I’ve never seen a course that would just so instantaneously BURY a so-so shot. (Maybe Chicago Golf, especially the 10th hole, which I would say might be harder than Augusta’s 12th.)


Bottom line: Augusta is the golf capital of Schadenfreude.

That is a fascinating insight Joe. To be honest I find it hard to fathom that the greens can be demonstrably faster than say, Oakmont, Pine Valley or Merion, but as I haven't played Augusta I can't form my own frame of reference.

From seeing it on TV, it would appear to me that it would be more playable for a mediocre golfer than the likes of Pine Valley or Oakmont, simply due to the general lack of deep rough and forced carries (certainly in the case of Pine Valley). But this is just speculation. Some day I hope I'll be able to make a proper comparison!

Ian Mackenzie

  • Karma: +0/-0
Alright, I'll make it easier on you.  What goes through either the mind of the intellectual or the numbskull on number one and is there any difference between the two?


"Fairways and greens"
"Keep it below the hole"
"Listen to your caddie"

Charlie_Bell

  • Karma: +0/-0
"Don't be stupid."

BCowan

What if Jkava got an invite to play ANGC but the only requirement was he had to play with Moriarty in his group.  The two then would drop balls down at 130 yards out on #11 and do best out of 3 with a putter for $500 winner take all.   :D

Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back