Oh, the debates that went on over dinner after a fun round at Chambers...there could be a lot more topics started on those discussions...but this one intrigued me the most...
Over dinner we started talking about Chambers Bay, and how it was designed to feel like a links course. Obviously, there are no true links courses in America by the purest definition, however when we refer to links courses in America, generally that means a lot of dunes, fairway and green movement, and the course is very close to water (as in seas and oceans, not like a lake, for example). By purest definition Pacific Dunes, or Bandon Dunes are not true links courses, and I can say that without even playing them.
However, that is a moo point really. Generally, courses like Chambers Bay and BD, PD, etc are designed to look and play like links courses. However, there was mention that Chambers Bay could not be a links course, ever, because of the severe elevation changes. There were arguments that true links courses such as Ballybunion and RCD had big elevation changes, yet they are still links courses.
My question, which I feel is worthy of some discussion, is how much elevation change is too much, before a course cannot be classified as a links course?
I cant really say too much on this topic because I have never played a true links course, and therefore cannot provide a worthy answer, however if there are any other related questions to further discussion bring em forward. I thought it was an interesting debate with just six or seven people arguing (ie. debating
), so I figured it would be fun to see what the whole GCA group has to say.