When I hear a golf course I am about to play has fast greens (anything 10' or faster), I become more excited about playing that course. Perhaps I am stuck in the misguided masses in this regard, but it's just the way it is.
I happen to think that fast greens expose green contours more effectively than do slow greens. Of course, if greens are maintained at too quick a pace, good hole locations are lost. However, by the same token, if a course is designed with fast greens in mind but still contains mild to severe contours, the "marginal" hole locations that might be necessitated become more intriguing anyway.
The golf course that illustrates my point best (as far as I know) is Pinehurst No. 2. If the greens are maintained at a speed of 8, then pins can be placed nearer the dropoff areas, but these areas can still carry the ball off the green. Now, if those same greens are maintained at a speed of 12, the pinnable area will be smaller and the "points of no return" will be further from the edge of the green. But, hole locations that would be boring on the 8-speed greens become interesting on the 12-speed greens. That is acceptable to me because I simply enjoy putting more on 12-speed greens than 8-speed greens, as do the vast, vast majority of golfers. Does that make us plebeian? Maybe so, but then again, as the majority, it is in most clubs' interests to bend to our will if possible.
A final word: I (and many of my ilk) love fast greens because it is a good way to glimpse the game that the pros play. Yes, it may be markedly more dificult, but in such a case, we are prepared to stomach the frustration when we consider the increased difficulty.