John,
I graduated from law school almost 3 years ago, and I'm not planning on being a millionaire lawyer (indeed, I would not be surprised if my salary this year will be the topping out point for me). And I take some exception to what seemed very much like a personal attack at me: I worked my ass off in college and law school, paying my own way through both. I work my ass off at my current job. I've never been a member at a private club but rather grew up playing at exclusively two municipal courses designed by your brother. To the extent I think it would be nice to be a member of a golf club in New England because I want to be part of a true golf community and am interested in finding ways that I can make the financially possible, I hardly think I am worthy of criticism.
Would it be okay to for me to look at creative ways to finance a club membership if I were 45? If so, I don't see why I can't do so at my age. The basic point is that the current price of memberships at clubs in my area approaches the point of absurdity, closing the doors to all but the wealthiest .1%. And yet the courses can't seem to fill up modest membership rolls, despite having glorious courses. Why am I to be criticized for wanting to find a middle ground that would benefit all involved? Between me and nothing, you honestly think that "nothing" is a better asset to a club with a half empty membership roll?
Furthermore, do you feel that private golf clubs are "presents" to people who have spent 20 years building a war chest? Or should they be communities of people who love golf and want to share that love with others, regardless of age?