George,
Blind chip shot up the hill and into the cup for a 2 at the par 3 8th at the Black Mesa GCA event to stun our competitors and spur the Pazin/Wright duo to victory? ...
Not to mention you were carrying an extra 200 pounds on your back the whole round....
I'm not sure my original idea really bore out, but here goes:
I think too often we evaluate golf courses in very straightforward terms. How were the par 3s? 4s? 5s? Did they offer options for everyone? Was there a balance of holes? Etcetera, etcetera.
Yet, look at the list of everyone's shots (well, maybe don't look at Jordan's, that's kind of scary
). You have hole outs galore, but they are from everywhere on the course. Maybe half of the respondents mentioned unusual recovery shots.
I haven't had the pleasure - yet - but I'm willing to guess that is the true magical mystery of The Old Course. The challenges are not simple, straightforward options, it's presenting the golfer with unusual opportunities to envision a shot, and try to execute it. When you do, it's magical.
So, with such a wild diverse array of shots, why do we - everyone, really, not just gca'ers - seem to evaluate courses in such a bland, rote manner? Do you receive a reward for challenging a bunker? Heck, I'm more interested in whether or not the architect gave you any kind of out (well, maybe nothing quite so extreme as Scott Coan's magical mystery wind tour).
I started thinking about this about responding on the "What do pros offer" thread, where John Cook made the (colossally bland, imho) observation that architects who are not pros can't imagine what a perfectly flighted 280 yard shot is.
I couldn't care less about a perfectly flighted 280 yard shot (and I've hit 'em, even me, a lowly high handicapper, hit a couple just a few weeks ago). What I care about is whether or not an architect can think about how to make the game interesting for everyone. Not EASY, anyone could make a super wide bland boring course with no contour, but INTERESTING.
Not sure whether or not all that BS was worth the build up, but it was fun reading everyone's responses nonetheless.
Here's my (by comparison) boring little best shot:
I was playing a relatively short par 4, maybe 380 or so (their scorecard is woefully inaccurate). I hooked my tee shot into the left rough. A tree guarded the inside leg of the dogleg. I was 9 iron distance away, but the shot was a bit uphill, with the tree in my way. I thought I had a little bit of a jumper lie, so I took my 7 iron, aimed just left of the tree, opened the face a bit, swung my usual hard swing, and the ball came out straight high and true, started just left of the green, and faded back just enough to drop onto the front of the green, and leave me with a birdie putt of about 15 feet, which I of course missed.
Nothing spectacular, it just came off exactly as a I envisioned and hoped. I even said to my playing partner, heck, this is nothing but a high cut 7 iron. And it was.