News:

This discussion group is best enjoyed using Google Chrome, Firefox or Safari.

Pages: [1]

Evan_Green

  • Karma: +0/-0
Reflection Bay vs. Rio Secco
« on: November 02, 2005, 09:04:29 PM »
Speaking of Vegas golf,

If you had to split 10 rounds between these two courses, how many would you play at each (e.g. 5-5, 4-6, 3-7, etc.) and why?

Thanks
Logged

Kevin_Reilly

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Reflection Bay vs. Rio Secco
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2005, 12:18:15 AM »
Sorry, nothing to offer except this review and pics of Rio Secco (I think there is another name for this course floating around GCA  ;D ) from another site:

Las Vegas pics galore

Registration on that site required.  
Logged
"GOLF COURSES SHOULD BE ENJOYED RATHER THAN RATED" - Tom Watson

Ben Cowan-Dewar

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Reflection Bay vs. Rio Secco
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2005, 08:42:18 AM »
Rio Secco was not all bad, but the real estate really hurt it. The canyon holes on the front nine are fairly dramatic.

I like Reflection Bay, but have not played it in a few years and I do not know their real estate situation.

I would play 7-3 RB to Rs, but I would rather play The Falls than either of them.
Logged

Jim Franklin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Reflection Bay vs. Rio Secco
« Reply #3 on: November 03, 2005, 04:02:23 PM »
I just played both a few weeks back and thought RS was better. Lots of homes now, but I thought a more interresting layout in better condition. The greens were substanially better at RS too. I had played both many years ago and would have been in the 7-3 RB-RS camp, but this last trip converted me to a 6-4 RS-RB guy.
Logged
Mr Hurricane
Pages: [1]
Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back