Ian,
I was going by you stating "not worth the trip", which I think Greywolf is even with it's remote location. That doesn't really have anything to do with being top 100 in the world.
I haven't been privvy to playing any of the courses in your "great" list, so I'm blind on that count, but I wonder how much more they have to offer as far as "great holes" are concerned. Having played a lot of rugged public courses in BC and Washington, and a few of the private clubs in Vancouver, I find one constant in that the rugged courses usually have more character than the private clubs because of their topography (the exception being Capilano of course) and that's a big thing for me, and probably why I like Greywolf so much. The other is scenery, which is far more abundant at say, a course like The Harvest Club, one of my favorites in Kelowna, than just about any private club that features bowling alleys lined with tall trees.
I'm curious as to what makes Royal Montreal and the National "dull or average" compared to St. Georges and Hamilton?
I did have the pleasure of playing the Monterey courses last year, and while Pebble and Spyglass are fantastic, I can honestly say for the money that taking a trip down the Kootenay trail and playing Golden, Eagle Ranch, Greywolf, Bootleg Gap and Copper Point for about the same price as Pebble Beach alone... well you get my drift.
For your breakdown on Greywolf, I'd have to say I'd put holes 3, 4 ,5, 8, 13, 14 and 17 in the "great" category, and 9 is better than average, but I'd concur with hole 12 which is probably the weakest hole on the property.
Thanks for bringing up Dakota Dunes, I knew I'd seen that "Sand Hills" project thet they were doing in Sask before, but I couldn't remember it.