Mr. Drake,
Time to pull off the gloves and go at it. Since you're entitled to your opinion, I won't attack you for saying whatever you wish. I will however take this opportunity to weigh in on this forum w/ a long overdue statement about Harmony, Doak, and development of top quality golf courses...
Harmony was conceived to be as close an ideal club for a large percentage of followers of GCA as possible...by accident. I never knew of GCA until Mike Young told me about it a couple of years ago when he and I were discussing my "vision" for Harmony. Since then, I have been stunned by the parallels of ideals and characteristics I wanted for Harmony, and those articulated by the hundreds of posts I have read on this site.
There have been threads about Doak's top 10 nirvanna characteristics...we've got them all; threads about green to tee distances; how many short par 3s/4s/5s you should have; how many long par 3s/4s/5s you should have; pros and cons on dogleg lefts vs. rights; using caddies; water as hazard vs. visual elements; the value of walking; the absence of housing and cart paths; redan greens; skyline greens; firm and fast vs. soft and target oriented; even what constitutes neat looking logos. The majority opinions on these issues are virtually all present in what Tom has designed for us.
Harmony has the "potential" to give the GCA player virtually all of what a large number of you value and hold dear. And attracting the player who "gets it" has always been more important to me than the masses who don't appreciate what this site is all about.
We SHOULD have 400 members by now if everyone we talked to was as knowledgeable about great golf as the majority of posters on this site. But reality is we have had to market to a lot of people who don't "get it".
There are very few examples of great courses getting built that don't have either a resort or real estate development hook. We're bold enough to try it. It may not fly, but I am not embarrased for making the effort.
Tom has great integrity and is concerned about the ethics of "selling" a project. But as was posted before, nothing happens until someone sells something...an idea, a vision, a proposal...and we are trying to sell anyone who we can touch that Harmony can be as good a golf experience as you can find...anywhere. Top quality work in golf architecture and selling the project by all involved is a must do if any project is to succeed...unless you're drawing for Trump.
For every player who gets gnats, mosquitoes, totally flat or artificially humped up courses in the coastal areas, we have a nice alternative. I would dispute that the golf is so much better in that area...just my personal opinion Mr. Drake.
But thanks for giving us your endorsement...We'll grind away for a while and see if a few more brave souls will come forward and help make Harmony happen. If we do, mark it down right now...this course will find acclaim and be highly regarded by those who play it...and I hope a bunch of GCA posters will get that chance.
Thanks to all for tolerating my vent.