nothing i see of value there....its way to young to have any real strategic values....they moved too much dirt for effect....its all about eyecandy.....Cascata ll....i'd pass on this one.
Paul, Paul, Paul (is there an exasperated look smiley?
)
I know you're trying to taunt what you see as our knee jerk reactions to Tom Fazio but there's no way we're going to let you off that easily.
Whaddaythinkwe'restupid??
First impression...are the greens as SLOPED as they look in those pictures?
I'm not talking internal contours...I'm talking SLOPE, because a number of them look as though they have major slope considerations to factor into the approach shots, which is always a cool thing.
Also, despite a little bit much shaping for my tastes, a good deal of that shaping is interesting and challenging convex stuff, which is almost always an interesting way to differentiate between shots that are superb or shots that are mediocre.
I do find myself wishing there was a little bit less of the stereotypical use of water on the par threes, and the "risk/reward" par fives, but overall, it looks like a course that would be intriguing, challenging, and probably also one that has a lot of variability in challenge based on hole location, wind direction, and amount of challenge the player is willing to take on any given day.
I also find myself wishing that the course is routinely kept hard and runny, the way bacon and eggs should be. It certainly looks like it's designed for that type of general maintenance.