News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Bryan Izatt

  • Karma: +0/-0
An AZ Tripleheader
« on: March 08, 2007, 04:43:24 PM »
Last week I was in Fountain Hills  AZ for 5 days.  An opportunity to play some of the oft mentioned in these threads courses.  So, first to Vista Verde, then Apache Stronghold and finally We-Ko-Pa Saguaro.  It was sunny but cool in the 50 to 60 degree range with a fair breeze each day.  Herewith, my opinions on the three courses.

Architecture:  Based on reputation, I figured Vista Verde would be the least of the three architecturally.  But such was not the case.  It had interesting strategic options on many holes.  The greens were particularly well done if you like lots of movement with false edges and lots of closely mown chipping areas all around.  I've not had so many recovery options from closely mown areas in a long time.  The greens rejected less than good shots.  Recoveries were difficult.  There were short fours, long fives and a couple of very good threes.

AS has been discussed much around here and it is architecturally strong.  The only mundane hole to me was the first - an unremarkable uphill par 5.  The rest stick in my mind with memorable features on each hole.

WKPS struck me as having more dramatic holes than the other two, but that is a function of the site.  Architecturally it is no doubt strong, but I must admit that it was not as minimalistic as I would have thought from C&C.  Not that that's a bad thing. I am not a big fan of Talking Stick North, so perhaps my expectations for WKPS were not so high. In balance In my opinion, WKPS makes a much more interesting and challenging course than TSN.

There were certainly many memorable holes.  But, there are four short par 4's which seems a few too many.  On first playing, I didn't see the reward being worth the risk on any of them.  So, 3 iron off four tees.  Also another minor criticism is that the three blind drives seemed a bit excessive.  Eighteen was a brute of a par 4 at 490 for me, but would be significantly easier for a long hitter able to carry the ridge and get the downhill kick.  On the other hand there was a really neat short three at the ninth and two excellent and dramatic par 5's in #8 and #14.  

None of the courses struck me as minimalist.  Clearly they've all been imposed on the ground at each site.

Setting:  For this flat land tree lined easterner the setting of each course in the  desert with mountainous backdrops is magnificant.  Oceans are better, but these are not bad from a setting point of view.  

VV has elevation change but it is more gently sloping on any given hole.  AS is similar but has some more abrupt elevation changes on some holes.  It is also more directly in the hills and more isolated hole to hole.  WKPS has more holes with dramatic roller-coaster rides in the course of one hole.  VV and AS are easier walking courses.  WKPS less so, despite the proximity of tees to greens.

Conditioning:  All three play firm and fast.  The overseeded rye at VV and WKPS is lush and well kept.  Their greens were both slick and hard.  AS's conditions have been thrashed around here, so I won't rehash that.  They're certainly adequate for me, but you'll never mistake them for conditions at upscale Phoenix courses.

Cost:  VV was $70 through www.golfnow.com. AS was $55 riding; $45 walking.  WKPS is $195 at all times (no twilight rate).  AS wins by a nose on the value scale for now.  VV will no doubt go over $100 as they get more established.  WKPS at $195 is marginal for me.  Once in a while maybe, but not regularly - unless I get to be an AZ resident.

Service:No significant difference.  They were all pleasant.  Befitting their price, We-Ko-Pa certainly has more kids hanging about the front.  VV has no clubhouse, but you check in and can use the Tonto Verde clubhouse which is very nice.

In all three cases bringing a wisk broom to dust off your bag after the round might not be a bad idea.

Overall: Overall, all three courses are definitely worth playing.  I can't rate one higher than the others.  VV is probably not quite up to the architectural standards of the other two but had wonderful green compleses.  AS has a great design and price, but the conditioning would wear on repeated playing in the winter and it's a fair ways out.  WKPS is dramatic and interesting and well conditioned, but, I can't get over the price.  And, the number of short 4's and blind tees. If you're in the neighbourhood, try all three.  None should be missed, in my opinion.

Visual Evidence

VV greens are generally pushed up and have false front and sides and closely mown recovery areas around the greens.  This from the side of the second green.



The short par 3 fourth.  Some cookie cutter bunker work.



Another potato chip elevated green.  These were fun trying to to hit and hold.



The par 5 sixth.  Strategic options to lay up to left trap; fly right trap; or, thread a fade between them.



A bad place to miss the 8th green.



A table top green and intimidating bunker greet an approach to the 10th from the wrong side of the fairway.



At 193 yards the 11th presents a real challenge at holding a shallow firm green between imposing bunkers.



Uncharacteristic trees pinching the left side approach to the 12th; a green with a substantial false front and drop-off back.



What would a desert course be without a pond.  A pretty sunset at the 18th.




To be cont'd


Bryan Izatt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2007, 04:46:50 PM »
The continuation of the visual evidence:

Apache Stronghold

The par 3 third sitting in a bowl in the hills.
 

A skyline green at the 4th.



The 5th a long demanding par 4  with a semi-Biarritz roll-away-back green.



The scenic short par 4 number 6.  Love the rumpled fairway.



The benign looking tee shot on the 8th.  Lots of room to the left, but best line is to the right to avoid a ridge encroaching  from the left near the green.



The short 11th



The panoramic tee shot on the 15th inviting you to bite off more than you can chew of the ridge on the right.



The tee shot on the 16th.  Do you have the balls to take a path directly at the green to the left over the desert waste to a blind landing area



The 17th is a long par 3 into the setting sun to a devilish green with a spine up the middle and an upper rear tier.




We-Ko-Pa Saguaro

The second is a short 4, but the risks look greater than the rewards to me given the length is slightly out of my range.




The par 5 fourth offers a magnificent view on the second shot.  But, the strategy inherent in the hole is reduced for me by the sheer length of the hole – at or over 600 yards from any of the men’s tees.



A blind tee shot on the 6th.  The short par 4 seventh has a similar looking blind tee shot.





The magnificent 8th – a par 5 that is reachable for us average golfers.  The rampart between the LZ and the green is a nice touch.



The short 9th.  A wonderful green and a touchy shot.  Too bad about the snack bar abuilding in the background.  A quasi-skyline green would have been neat.



Another magnificent par 5 at the 14th.  A split fairway with similar shot values as the 10th at AS, but much more dramatically presented.



A magnificent view on the long par 3 fifteenth.  Despite its length, not as hard as it looks.



Jay Flemma

Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #2 on: March 08, 2007, 04:50:11 PM »
Aha!  So others DO agree with me that 5 is a modified biarritz type of green!

Bryan Izatt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #3 on: March 08, 2007, 04:55:53 PM »
Jay,

I do.  Although Tom D doesn't.

Steve_ Shaffer

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #4 on: March 08, 2007, 05:08:25 PM »
Bryan,

Thanks for the report and the pictures. Vista Verde has yet to be noticed by the golfing press. The course is very good and its proximity to the Tonto National Forest provides some good scenery and there are no houses there...yet.
I couldn't fit in Saguaro during my recent trip. Next trip will suffice. As I said before about Apache Stronghold, the warmer the weather, the better the conditions.

 
"Some of us worship in churches, some in synagogues, some on golf courses ... "  Adlai Stevenson
Hyman Roth to Michael Corleone: "We're bigger than US Steel."
Ben Hogan “The most important shot in golf is the next one”

Andy Troeger

Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #5 on: March 08, 2007, 05:11:21 PM »
Bryan,
Thanks for posting and great photos. I played VV in January on a trip there and am scheduled to play Saguaro on Monday so I'm even more excited now to play it. Hopefully I'll see AS eventually too.

redanman

Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #6 on: March 08, 2007, 05:42:43 PM »
I've been meaning to post these.
Here's two more of the Bottle hole at Saguaro





Jay Flemma

Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #7 on: March 08, 2007, 06:25:01 PM »
Brian: I know he doesn't, but so many people see the elements...

Bill the resolution on your photos is staggeringly good!  How do get them so rich?  What resolution and size?

Eric_Terhorst

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #8 on: March 08, 2007, 08:08:01 PM »
Bryan,

Great job on the pics, certainly whets the appetite.

Can you elaborate on what you observed that caused you to report the courses have "all been imposed on the ground"?

I've only played We-Ko-Pa, but I didn't get that feeling.

Thanks


John Foley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #9 on: March 08, 2007, 09:48:33 PM »
Bryan - Great pics! When we're you there? I was at Saguaro last Wednesday and liked the course alot. The par 5 13 & par 3 14th are a great back to back pair.

Definetly will check Vista Verde next time through
Integrity in the moment of choice

Jon Spaulding

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #10 on: March 08, 2007, 10:47:42 PM »
Wow! Time for me to get back over to phx.... thanks for the great photos; finally someone puts a visual to all the conversation.
You'd make a fine little helper. What's your name?

Bryan Izatt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #11 on: March 09, 2007, 01:03:05 AM »
Eric,

Perhaps imposed is too hard a word.  I'm still struggling with minimalism and it's clear to me that the teeing areas are all manufactured as are many if not all the green sites.  The fairways perhaps less so, but,for instance, if you look at the picture of the 6th at Saguaro, the bunkers up the left side of the fairway drop abruptly from the fairway. Either the fairway was raised or the bunkering area lowered.  If you remember the rest of the hole the fairway sweeps over the ridge, down through a swale and back up to the green.  A wonderful ribbon of fairway looking back from the green.  But, I'm betting the swale started as an arroyo and was filled.  I'm not expert enough to identify all these gradings, but I bet they're there.  In a desertscape I'd guess that there is no option but to "impose" the course on the ground.  The natural ground is too inhospitable to host a grass environment without some serious modification.  

John,

I was out there last Saturday, late in the day.  Nowithstanding my comments I liked the course a lot too, although I'm still struggling with the $195 + tax tab.  (You're not an Arizonian are you.  It'd be interesting to know the resident rate.)  I just didn't think it was head and shoulders over the neighbours, including the Cholla course.  Now, I did like it a lot more than TSN, but that's likely just because the land it's built on was a lot more interesting and dramatic than the TSN pancake.

Jason Topp

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #12 on: March 09, 2007, 11:09:04 AM »

Another magnificent par 5 at the 14th.  A split fairway with similar shot values as the 10th at AS, but much more dramatically presented.





Have others liked this hole?  I find split fairways rarely work well.  I think it is because either (1) one option is clearly superior to the other, such that the element of making a choice disappears or (2) the consequences of taking either option do not matter much taking away any significance to the decision.

On this hole, (based on one round) I felt like the right option was not one I would even consider if I were ever playing for score because of its tightness, its crowned nature and the unlikelihood that I would reach the green anyway.

It could be I'm just bitter because my tee shot took a hard left bounce into the wash.

Matt_Ward

Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #13 on: March 10, 2007, 11:29:23 AM »
Bryan:

Enjoyed your comments -- a few responses.

The 4th at Vista Verde is better than the "cookie cutter" bunker comment you provided. Try holding that green with any pin placement towards the rear left side. Not easy by any means -- even with a wedge or short iron.

Bryan, you did a nice diplomatic tap dance on not saying definitively which of the three is better than the others. That's clearly your prerogative.

I have played all three and see Vista Verde as the best of the three options. The sheer diversity of the holes, the better overall routing and the green shapes / contours are all well done.

AS would have a possible advantage if / when the turf conditions can ever be consistent throughout a playing season.

Frankly, C&C's effort at Saguaro is a been there / seen that situation for me. I loved the final seven holes -- they are first rate indeed in so many ways -- but the opening group of holes leaves me wondering if C&C have more in their design menu than a cut'n paste of previous efforts.

Great pictures you provided -- they really do capture the feeling of each !


Bryan Izatt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #14 on: March 11, 2007, 04:09:04 PM »
Jason,  

Quote
Have others liked this hole?  I find split fairways rarely work well.  I think it is because either (1) one option is clearly superior to the other, such that the element of making a choice disappears or (2) the consequences of taking either option do not matter much taking away any significance to the decision.

On this hole, (based on one round) I felt like the right option was not one I would even consider if I were ever playing for score because of its tightness, its crowned nature and the unlikelihood that I would reach the green anyway.

It could be I'm just bitter because my tee shot took a hard left bounce into the wash.

Re point 1 above, I'm not sure it's because one option is "superior"; more likely because one is clearly "safer".  Which leads to point 2 - at least as it regards this hole - I couldn't likely reach the green in two even from the right fairway, so what's the point in taking that route and risk.  Perhaps when architects create split fairway holes they design the hole length and the options based on some length that they think players from each tee will average.  On this hole it looks like a 280 drive and 220 second, uphill would do it.  But, how many people have those two shots consecutively.  Seems like a moot exercise to create options that most can't realistically exercise.

I considered the right option, but didn't take it for the reasons you outlined and the likelihood that I couldn't reach even oof the direct distance might have been 500 yards rather than the listed 527.

Could be you're bitter.  Could you have reached if you had made the right fairway?  Or were you just suckered?

Bryan Izatt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #15 on: March 11, 2007, 04:29:57 PM »
Bryan:

Enjoyed your comments -- a few responses.

The 4th at Vista Verde is better than the "cookie cutter" bunker comment you provided. Try holding that green with any pin placement towards the rear left side. Not easy by any means -- even with a wedge or short iron.

I didn't mean to imply it was a bad hole, just that as I looked at the pictures I was struck by the sameness of those bunker shapes.  Why would they design bunkers like that?  As to the hole, I liked it; in fact I liked the first three par 3's a lot.  The last one was very average (except that it rejected my well struck shot to the middle of the green).

Bryan, you did a nice diplomatic tap dance on not saying definitively which of the three is better than the others. That's clearly your prerogative.

It wasn't a tap dance.  I wasn't trying to determine which was best, just making comparative points.  They all had strengths and weaknesses.  All were worth playing.  I like all of them better than TSN.  But amongst the three I wasn't trying to choose.  Ranking courses gets silly and personal

I have played all three and see Vista Verde as the best of the three options. The sheer diversity of the holes, the better overall routing and the green shapes / contours are all well done.

Perhaps you could expand on the diversity and overall routing and how it's supperior.  Recalling the recent routing thread I'm not sure how one evalautes that - especially in terms that anyone else would agree with.  The green shapes and contours and the closely mown runoff areas were certainly different than the other two.  Does that make it better?

AS would have a possible advantage if / when the turf conditions can ever be consistent throughout a playing season.

Frankly, C&C's effort at Saguaro is a been there / seen that situation for me. I loved the final seven holes -- they are first rate indeed in so many ways -- but the opening group of holes leaves me wondering if C&C have more in their design menu than a cut'n paste of previous efforts.

This is only my second C&C after TSN so I can't comment on the cookie cutter comment.  But I think you're being a bit harsh about the first 13 holes.  Holes 4, 6, 7, 8,  9 and 11 were pretty good holes IMHO.  

Overall my choice of course for multiple replays is likely to be swayed by economic issues rather than architecture for these three courses.  Given the same prices I expect I'd split my time evenly.  Given the current prime time prices, Saguaro would get significantly less play from me.


Great pictures you provided -- they really do capture the feeling of each !

Thanks

Ryan Farrow

Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #16 on: March 11, 2007, 07:46:48 PM »
Vista looks like it has some serious problems transitioning from course to desert which looks awful - straight lines of grass then desert - very sterile.  The other two courses look like they flow into the landscape far better.  However, from the pix it is difficult to see why WKPS is 4x the price of AS.  Surprisingly, I like the look and placement (many of the wing bunkers look like fancy catchment areas though) of the WKPS bunkers.  Are these a typical C&C look and is there anything unusual about their placement compared to other C&C courses?

Ciao


Sean, are you serious? Besides the extremes in conditioning WKPS is in Scottsdale and AS is an hour and a half outside of Phoenix.

Anyways I have a round lined up at Vista Verde Tuesday, I'll be sure to post some comments about VV. Hopefully I have some time to make the trip to Apache in the next few weeks. I really want to get into this debate. I am coming for you Ward.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2007, 08:39:08 PM by Ryan Farrow »

Bryan Izatt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #17 on: March 11, 2007, 08:51:22 PM »
Sean,

I didn't really notice any difference in transitioning to the desert.  Perhaps what you're seeing is that VV ran it's overseed right to the desert (although they left a ring of dormant bermuda around the traps.  Maybe one of the archies or supers could comment on why that's generally done on the desert courses).  WKPS left a band of dormant Bermuda between the overseed and the desert.  Maybe that makes the transition look better.  AS is all dormant so it's often difficult to tell whats the fairway and what's the desert - no transition visual issues.

I've only played one other C&C; these bunkers looked similar but not quite the same.  Perhaps because TSN is relatively a lot flatter.

Bryan Izatt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #18 on: March 11, 2007, 08:59:30 PM »
Ryan,

Actually it's 2 hours out of Phoenix.  But then Bandon is like 6 hours out of anywhere and their prices are not low.

Is conditioning really worth even half the difference?  For this humble soul WKPS is over-priced, although that seems to be what this market can bear.   I wonder how much of their business is tourists paying this full ticket.  Let us know how much you pay at WKPS (assuming you're an AZ resident).  If not let us know how a young university student manages the $195 ticket.

Get yourself out there to VV and AS and then tell us what you think.

Jason Topp

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #19 on: March 12, 2007, 10:47:37 AM »

Could be you're bitter.  Could you have reached if you had made the right fairway?  Or were you just suckered?

I don't know if I could have reached but I was definitely not suckered.  I was pretty sure it was a dumb play but decided to try it, because the fun of the attempt is far more important than the result.  Nonetheless, I only think it is a good hole if it is a reasonable option.  I doubt it is too often.  

Andy Hughes

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #20 on: March 12, 2007, 11:10:04 AM »
Sean, I tend to agree. But what made me chuckle was the first picture that struck me along those lines was actually the C&C course:


Bryan, thanks...I am slowly starting to warm up to these desert courses!  Some of the backdrops are stunning, and it is nice to hear the courses bounce and roll. I wish Mid-Atlantic courses did that  ::)
"Perhaps I'm incorrect..."--P. Mucci 6/7/2007

John Kavanaugh

Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #21 on: March 12, 2007, 11:17:04 AM »


 

I have got to give huge kudoes to the desert tie in...You can't tell where the tee ends and the desert begins.

Bryan Izatt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #22 on: March 12, 2007, 11:30:57 AM »
Sean,

I think that WKPS and VV were similar in having stark demarcation lines.  I think to a large extent that the differences you see are the result of the selection of pictures.  In addition, C&C more often, but not always, used bunkers as the tie-in between fairway and desert.  The crossing washes are also different at each course - WKPS generally being deep whereas VV generally had flatter washes.  Creates a different look, but the demarcation lines were just as abrupt.   The picture Andy posted is an example of straight lines at WKPS.  There are others that I didn't post.

Andy,

Yes, lots of bounce and roll.  At the price of nicks and grooves on the bottom of the irons (if you take any kind of divot). There's gravelly desert right under the turf.  I'm not sure how they manage to get turf grass to grow on such a shallow bed.

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +2/-1
Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #23 on: March 12, 2007, 11:34:16 AM »
Matt:

I have not seen either Vista Verde or We Ko Pa, but I am baffled by your comment that Vista Verde (or any one of the three courses) has a "better overall routing" than the other two.  What exactly does that mean?

In my mind you can only evaluate a routing based on a specific piece of property, so it's impossible to compare the "routings" of different courses.  Do you mean that one course provides more variety of golf holes than the other?  That one changes direction better?  What, exactly?

Bryan Izatt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:An AZ Tripleheader
« Reply #24 on: March 12, 2007, 11:34:20 AM »
Jason,

I agree.

As a matter of interest, were you able to extract yourself from the wash?  I don't remember if it was red staked.  If it wasn't it could well end up requiring an unplyable lie as well as being difficult to get out of.  Struck me as a harsh penalty.  If it was red staked, then not so bad.

Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back