JMEvensky,
You are correct in that we get precious little female insight into our conversations. I realize we are an architecture discussion group, but we certainly wander away from that topic. One thing I've never seen discussed is the greatness of Annika Sorenstam. Playing in an era that overlapped with Tiger Woods, her dominance was every bit as formidable, yet went largely unnoticed. Comparing their records during their primes (TW 1996-2013; 1994-2008 AS) and excluding seasons curtailed by injury (2010-11 TW; 2007 AS) from 1996 (Tiger's rookie season) to 2008 (Annika's final year), the similarities are striking:
Event entered: TW 276; AS 307
Cuts made: TW 267 (96.7%); AS 298 (97.1%)
Wins: TW 79 (28.6%); AS 72 (23.5%)
Top 10s: TW 181 (65.6%); AS 212 (69.1%)
36 of Tiger's entries and 18 wins were no-cut WGC events, but excluding those events has little statistical impact on the figures. While the LPGA has a number of limited field events with no cut, researching every one would be overly exhaustive.
Another interesting perspective on Annika's greatness comes from the question "what if she played for the same prize money as Tiger?". If you take the average first place check from each of Tiger's wins from their overlap years of 1996-2008 and award that sum to Annika, her prize money during that period would have been $63,404,975 vs. the actual $57,45,015 he pocketed from his wins. It's also noteworthy that during those overlap years Annika amassed all 72 of her LPGA wins, while Tiger won 65 events in the same span.
Now you know why I am excited about Annika's entry into this week's LPGA event and why I'm hoping she'll play the Senior Women's Open this summer. Tiger and Annika dominated their sports for more than a decade, establishing a level of greatness in an individual sport that has only been since approached (or in my opinion, exceeded - but that's another discussion) by Mikaela Shiffrin.