I wouldn't post it, if it were just hearsay or otherwise unsubstantiated. It was in the regional newspaper. Said architect was interviewed about a new course he was building. The concrete question was which data he would research before building a course.
He replied that weather data was important for various reasons and in the course of that explanation the notion of protecting greens from the sun by planting trees came up. The whole paragraph is IMHO too complex for a simple misquotation. In the next sentence he said that greens are cut at 3mm and have 50cm roots. So he was definitely talking about greens and he was very specific.
The reason I posted this was to find an advocatus diaboli. Anyone up for that?
Ulrich