Yesterday I had the great pleasure of playing this brand new course and very private and very expensive (for The Nethelrands - 28,000 euro entry) together with the architect Bruno Steensels.
Now the dilemma for me is this. What the heck do you end up with if you have the worst location and the architect simply kills it and puts together one of the best routings you've experienced on a new course? To put this place into perspective, it's build next to Amsterdam Schiphol airport, on the 5th hole planes come as close as 150 meters above you while landing. The course is then bordered on the South and West ends by two of the major freeways in The Netherlands. Yes, there is noise, lots of it, the surrounding are ugly, there is distraction everywhere and somehow against my better judgement on an semi cold, very windy and miserable day I loved the routing. I'm certain many will argue that's it's the best architectural work in The Netherlands. It's certainly one of the most playable courses and will no doubt host the Dutch Open as soon as the other contractual obligations are met.
Have any of you had this experience before at other clubs. I have to admit an architect killing it with an A location is the best but I just don't know how low you can rate a location, F? Then have the architect kill it....what do you get?
A little help to get me through this crisis please?