I had the pleasure of playing Dalmunzie last weekend. Met the Australian lady who runs the hotel and was very nice however couldn't offer anything more than she was vaguely aware the course was a MacKenzie. Even with it being a saturday afternoon, there was only two other golfers on the course. So as a fact finding trip to find out more about MacKenzies involvement, it wasn't much of a success.
However I thoroughly enjoyed the golf and the course definitely comes into the category of "sporty" even if the greenkeeping were any more basic it would be left purely to the rabbits to keep the grass short.
Theres now no sand bunkers on the course, or if there is I managed to miss them. I would also surmise that the last two holes probably weren't in the original routing. Looking through previous threads, those holes have been invariably described as being on boggy ground which I can confirm was the case with my visit. The par 3 8th is an interesting hole as Rich suggests with a couple of trees out front of the green however the par 4 dog-leg 9th which loops round the 8th just doesn't seem to work well, particularly in relation to the 8th.
Looking at the old postcard that Neil posted, the lost green referred to by Rich is right beneath the arrow beside golf course and shows the two flanking bunkers. I suspect that this was a double green or at least a single green played to from opposite directions. Given the course was originally a private one with limited play, I imagine this wouldn't have posed a problem. The course clearly wasn't intended to be a championship test in terms of length. I reckon most of the holes would have been par 3's or short par 4's.
If I'm right then at some point the 3rd and 4th would have been combined to form the existing 3rd hole, and what was then the 7th and 8th holes were combined to produce what is now the 6th hole with the two lost holes been replaced by the new 8th and 9th holes on the boggy ground. I suspect this was done not only to try and provide some more "standard" golf in terms of length but also to allow for greater play.
Looking at the features of the course, I can definitely see some good work in at least a couple of the greens, with the 2nd and 6th greens in particular melding in nicely with the surrounds, but some of the others have lips and ledges on them that look as though they may have been added later and look a bit clumsy.
Overall a good fun 9 holer although I wouldn't necessarily drive half way across the country to play it. But if you are in the area why not ?
Niall