[PThomas]

The only person being arguementative is you. I have no interest in arguing with you, TD or anyone else, and I have no interest in turning this into marathon thread. I asked TD a generic question regarding what influence he may or may not have on client, and if he is incline to use it. And relating to those questions I would think a minimal amount of historical due diligence would be a requirement.

Requirement?  unless you hired Tom and are paying his fee the use of that word is ridiculous


you need to get off your high horse and stop telling people what they should do

[Tom MacWood]

Paul
Yes, I'm questioning what he is doing, but I don't believe I've told what he needs to do. I won't tell you what you need to do either, but I will encourage you to relax. I'm not a fan of historic courses being remodeled please forgive me. What is your interest in North Shore, Raynor, White, or CBM?

[Tom MacWood]

Well, this is is going to sound like I am another Daok ass kisser, and I waited a few days before posting it because of that...but this is what I have been thinking about since I read Brad's article. Most here will agree that Tom is one of the best architects working today, right? And with so few prospects for brand new courses in the US, especially in the New York metro area where there is little land left, a renovation is about all one can hope for if you are a fan of his work. If we fast forward 20 or 30 years when Doak is done building courses, it seems obvious that he will have a solid place among all past architects and it will be a very good thing that an example of his work will be just outside of NYC, even if he had to steal one of Raynors sites.  I am a huge fan of Raynor but I have to acknowledge that there are many fine Raynor courses in the NY-NJ area, so I guess we can make room for a Doak.

You're a huge Raynor fan? Were you aware he is dead? Easy come, easy go.

[Tags:]

Tags:

[Tags:]

Tags:

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()