TEPAUL,
In your last post to Mr. Wendt, you make it sound like the whole reason that you're against the fairway irrigation is because "it looked cool to play and look at." I think that Maidstone would benefit more than anyone might know and this would save so many headaches from Robert Williams. I think that you need to give Mr. Williams some credit-He been the superintendent at Maidstone, a perenial Top 100 course, for years, so I'm going to guess that he knows a thing or two about watering and keeping things fast a firm. It's really amazing what supterintendent's know, especially those at Top 100 courses..there are reasons that they are there. Keep in mind the type of membership that they have there-I'm sure that they'd like to play on grass from time to time. We have 1500 irrigation heads and each green is equiped with back to back heads, as most updated courses are. Does this mean that we water every night with these heads? Not-we hand water to prvide an firm, drier surface and only apply water where it's needed. By Maidstone putting an irrigation system in is just another tool for them in a time of crisis...I'm sure that Mr. Williams will not loose sight of the things that Maidstone is known for.
I personally think that Maidstone is extremely overrated. Take away #8, #9, and #14 and Montauk Downs is the better course. But keep in mind, I look at courses with a much keener eye to argonomy, but it still doesn't take away from the fact that Maidstone is overrated. #1-3 might be the worst opening 3 holes on a Top 100 course....
Tony Nysse
Sr. Asst. Supt.
Long Cove Club
HHI, SC