This post is promoted by a shamelessly cheap post from "Did the Open help Carnoutie" wherein I was wrongly (perhaps even libelously) accused of adopting two different stances on the merits of Pinehurst No.2.For the record, Pinehurst is one of the world's top 20 or so courses. It is no better, no worse. World top 10 talk is nonsense.It is no better because there is a sameness to the challenge. At no point is a tee shot thrilling or does it make your heart beat faster (other than 1st tee jitters). There are no variety of hazards. Take Augusta's back nine. Water in the form of ponds and creeks front greens, are on the left side of greens, are along the right side of a green, and water is even over one green. There is a bunkerless hole, there is a hole where the bunkers are key, there is a swale that is key (the 13th), uphill shots, down hill shots. In short there is heaps of variety.At Pinehurst, the variety is in chipping with a three wood through to a putter - very admirable yes, but clearly not exhaustive or possessing great variety.The greatest courses (Cypress, Sand Hills, Royal Melbourne, Pine Valley, County Down etc.) are all built on a huge scale using mother nature at her fullest.Pinehurst is a better example of the art of the architect rather than the art of mother nature. And thus, as we all agree that nature is best, Pinehurst must move to the back of the bus when it comes to great courses, but it is still on the bus.The above is right and incontrovertible. Thank you for your time.