I have played Ferry Point and can tell you without hesitation that it was a lot of fun to play. I'm not an architecture expert, but I've played enough golf to know that what's most important to me is playability and fun factor. Ferry Point (at least the day we played it with the fescue grasses cut down) checked both boxes for me. The walks from green to tee are a bit far for my taste, but the golf course is definitely walkable considering the gentle nature of the topography.
As you would expect, the golf course was in immaculate condition. I'm impressed that they resisted the temptation to open this year. As a comparison, I played Bayonne several weeks before it opened, and it wasn't nearly as well conditioned as Ferry Point is right now.
The course has nice width and the hazards are nicely placed within the driving zone. I appreciated and enjoyed the challenge off the tee and trying to determine the best angles into the greens. They did a really nice job layering the bunkers together on the sight lines off the tees. If I'm being picky I'd say they could have used small dunes in the fairways in place of or in addition to some of the bunkers to add some extra character.
The greens are very nice. They have nice movement to them, but are not too severe. They were rolling really well the day we played and i can imagine that at tournament speeds they will provide sufficient challenge for the tour pros, while at the same time remaining eminently fair. I'm not sure what speed they intend to keep them at for every day play, but they wont be boring even at slower speeds.
The lions mouth bunkers in the front of the greens are a bit repetitive but there are lots of other features (bumps, dips, plateus, etc.) out in front of the greens that make approach shots interesting. I do not agree with a previous poster that the ground game is not a viable option. I think hickories would be a blast...
The bunkers are not as severe as I would ideally like them to be as far as depth and slopes, but considering the course is meant for general public play, they are probably appropriately difficult. Aesthetically, they are a bit too pretty for my taste and will benefit from the wear and tear of public play. The rough around the fairway bunkers is lush and I had several balls get hung up in the grass rather than in the bunker. I'd prefer the edges be maintained lower and more ragged, but that's personal taste and probably a bit of an unfair statement as the golf course isn't even open yet and is technically still in grow-in.
As for fairway drainage I honestly only noticed one catch basin on 18 holes. Its not that there aren't more, its just that i didn't notice any of them.... and IMO if I didn't notice them... i highly doubt they will impact play or perception for the average golfer. The dunes or mounds (whatever you prefer to call them) are not continuous and are significantly less monotonous and hallway-esque than Bayonne. I can't say faux dunes are my favorite... but they aren't anywhere near as horrible as some have made them out to be.
In the end, I'm not ready to call it an architectural marvel (I'll leave that critique to the people far more qualified in routing and building), but I can report that I had a great time and I expect that the public NYC public golfer will too. As for tour events I have no idea... but since when did we start judging golf courses on their ability to host for those guys anyway?