Thinking along the lines of a course that works for all players:
Deep narrow greens that are angled in the direction of fairway hazards. Pro iron shots land in a slightly offset ellipse because they usually hit the ball solidly. Such greens pose less of a problem to everyday players who do not hit the ball as solid, particularly if the surrounds are short grass.
Deep fairway bunkers and shallow greenside bunkers. A fairway bunker likely costs the club player a shot but do not cause a huge problem for a pro. I do not think deep green side bunkers pose a much more difficult problem for a pro while being impossible for a club player.
Deep Fairway bunkers positioned at such a length from the green and tee that a pro pays a big price for not risking them off the tee. Laying up short requires a 225+ yard approach while driving it over is not possible. The design needs to provide a significant enough reward that hitting an accurate driver is worth it to the pro. I think that such an approach could work if the green design provides a big advantage to being in a particular spot and then covering that spot with a big, deep bunker.
Par threes that require a driver, a two iron, a five iron and a short iron - whatever those distances might be.
A couple of holes that play as a par 4 for the pros but a par 5 for members with a design making the second shot interesting for club members.
Steep falloffs behind some greens. Those seem to give pros problems without affecting most club members.