News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +2/-1
Discussion from another thread
« on: August 06, 2010, 12:54:47 PM »
Pacific Dunes is much more deliberately restrained than Lost Dunes (or Kingsley), at the client's request, and that is just one reason it is appreciated by more people.

Tom,

Can you provide a little insight as to something you lobbied for at Pacific Dunes that Mr. Keiser shot down, or perhaps something significant you would have done differently had it been the same piece of land with a different client (say Mr. Shearer instead)?  Did you enact restraint from the get go, or was it a learning process?

At Lost Dunes, aside from the inherent environmental restraints, did you have all the artistic capital you desired? 


Josh:

We never had a disagreement about any particular feature at Pacific Dunes.  By the time the project started, I had known Mike Keiser for 5 or 6 years, and played or walked around with him at High Pointe, Crystal Downs, Stonewall, Lost Dunes, and Bandon Dunes, plus a bunch of links courses in Northern Ireland.  Over that time we talked a lot about what he liked and didn't like, and how in particular he didn't want the greens at Pacific Dunes to be too severe or too controversial; but at the same time I saw that he didn't mind having the same sorts of contours at the edges of the greens.  So, we built small to mid-sized greens with any bold contouring mostly at the edges.  The learning process was sort of backwards ... we started by constraining ourselves, and then got a bit bolder as we figured out what would be okay with Mike.

Since I knew Mike so well going into the project, I never really thought about doing things differently than that.  And the course has been successful enough that it would be pretty pointless to suggest something I might have done differently.  The only thing we ever disagreed about was whether to put in more back tees.  I resisted on that count, because I didn't think there were opportunities to do it without messing up the natural terrain, and because I thought it was better to keep the course a bit shorter as a balance to the normally windy conditions.

At Lost Dunes, Jeff Shearer handled things a bit differently ... he would come out and look at what we were building, but usually he would have a look by himself and then relay his thoughts or questions to me afterward, instead of walking around with me, as Mike usually did.  Jeff did express concern about particular greens along the way, but he always just encouraged me to take a look at it again, and be sure that it wasn't too severe.  I changed a couple of things after those conversations, and didn't change a couple of others, most notably #4 green.

The only clients who gave me pretty much unlimited freedom in building their courses are Don Hayden at High Pointe, Richard Sattler at Barnbougle Dunes, and Rupert and Jim O'Neal at Ballyneal.  They came out and looked a what we were doing, but were always encouraging and never really questioned anything.  I think Mr. Hayden probably wished he had said something more to me, but the others have never looked back with regret, as far as I know.

George Pazin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Discussion from another thread
« Reply #1 on: August 06, 2010, 01:02:53 PM »
The only clients who gave me pretty much unlimited freedom in building their courses are Don Hayden at High Pointe, Richard Sattler at Barnbougle Dunes, and Rupert and Jim O'Neal at Ballyneal.  They came out and looked a what we were doing, but were always encouraging and never really questioned anything.  I think Mr. Hayden probably wished he had said something more to me, but the others have never looked back with regret, as far as I know.

Have you ever felt that unlimited freedom can be more difficult?

In my own (sad) little case, printing t shirts, I find the clients who say the least are often the most difficult when everything is said and done. That is of course a gross generalization, and in a mostly unrelated field, but I just wondered if maybe sometimes too much freedom can be a bad thing.
Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +2/-1
Re: Discussion from another thread
« Reply #2 on: August 06, 2010, 01:16:47 PM »

Have you ever felt that unlimited freedom can be more difficult?

In my own (sad) little case, printing t shirts, I find the clients who say the least are often the most difficult when everything is said and done. That is of course a gross generalization, and in a mostly unrelated field, but I just wondered if maybe sometimes too much freedom can be a bad thing.


George:  I agree with you.  In the end, I had a hard time with Mr. Hayden at High Pointe because he didn't seem entirely happy with everything and he had never said anything along the way to let me know.  I learned that I should have been asking him as we went, so he wouldn't get to the end and not like everything about it, and have rabbit ears when golfers came in and vented.  [They always do.]

Also, even at Barnbougle and Ballyneal, it is impossible to just be an artist and have no concern for the financial success of a project, when you are working with other people's money.  You can throw out a T-shirt if you don't like it and make a different one.  I guess a couple of guys have done that with golf courses lately, but it is a bit more costly in golf!

Bill Brightly

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Discussion from another thread
« Reply #3 on: August 06, 2010, 03:20:43 PM »
  The only thing we ever disagreed about was whether to put in more back tees.  I resisted on that count, because I didn't think there were opportunities to do it without messing up the natural terrain, and because I thought it was better to keep the course a bit shorter as a balance to the normally windy conditions.

[/quote]

What about the two green complexes at Hole 9 at Pac Dunes? I really like them both (but only got to play the one on the right.) Wasn't that a compromise?

Carr Harris

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Discussion from another thread
« Reply #4 on: August 06, 2010, 05:01:07 PM »
Tom,

I'm curious, have you ever found yourself in a situation where a client was interested in something so bold that you were the one putting the brakes on?

In the stories you've shared that I'm aware of, it seems you have been the one to push the envelope on certain features and your clients have had the more conservative outlook.

I'm just interested if the opposite is ever true.

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +2/-1
Re: Discussion from another thread
« Reply #5 on: August 06, 2010, 06:37:07 PM »
 
What about the two green complexes at Hole 9 at Pac Dunes? I really like them both (but only got to play the one on the right.) Wasn't that a compromise?

Bill:  No, that was just an addition.  We started with the right-hand green on the ninth at Pacific, and both tees ... lower tee for the blues, upper tee for the whites.  But after we got that built, I looked down at the site for the lower green, and liked that, too, so we asked Mike if we could build it as well ... then evolved the design into using the two greens and two tees in pairs.

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +2/-1
Re: Discussion from another thread
« Reply #6 on: August 06, 2010, 06:38:54 PM »
Tom,

I'm curious, have you ever found yourself in a situation where a client was interested in something so bold that you were the one putting the brakes on?


Carr:  Not often, but occasionally a client will want to do something that I think is too over the top.  I won't name names, but I have been successful at toning them down / dragging my heels.  If my mom were alive, you could ask her how easy it is to get me to do something I don't want to do.  ;)

Ian_L

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Discussion from another thread
« Reply #7 on: August 06, 2010, 07:39:08 PM »
I hope this doesn't come off as obnoxious: if constraints were placed on you at Pacific Dunes, doesn't that mean that you think you could have made an even better course without them?  Unless, of course, you think Mr. Keiser's cautiousness was warranted.

Fun thread so far.

Carl Rogers

Re: Discussion from another thread
« Reply #8 on: August 06, 2010, 08:07:31 PM »
Tom,
I have only two points of reference ... Beechtree (NLE & sadly RIP) & Riverfront

Playing Beechtree only three times before its closing. I remember only the holes 2, 10 & 16 as having a lot of slope.  The green speeds were faster than I had ever played.

Riverfront that has been pointed out by many has a lot of green movement by anybody's definition.

Did your clients have a lot input or yea - nea on these two courses?  Did the any of these greens get revision in the field?

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +2/-1
Re: Discussion from another thread
« Reply #9 on: August 06, 2010, 09:36:10 PM »
I hope this doesn't come off as obnoxious: if constraints were placed on you at Pacific Dunes, doesn't that mean that you think you could have made an even better course without them?  Unless, of course, you think Mr. Keiser's cautiousness was warranted.


Ian:

I don't think "constraints" is really the right word.  The client had his preferences, and we tried to understand those preferences and adapt to them.  Nearly all projects are like taht.  In fact, I've said before that the only way an architect can REALLY do exactly what he wants is if he is funding the course himself ... as did George Crump or Bill Fownes.

Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back