Six of the top 20 courses have changed when comparing the top 20 courses in 1997 to the latest list in 2009 , as presented by
Golf Digest Magazine (America's 100 Greatest Golf Courses). I suggest that the 2009 top 20 list is a stronger set of courses, offering more diversity and range of course types. I have been fortunate enough to play the Top 100 courses listed on the 1997 list and have recently written a book detailing my passionate pursuit (which took over 20 years to complete). After writing the book I have decided to donate the proceeds to the First Tee Program, which introduces the virtues of golf to under-privledged kids. Here is a link to my book on Amazon.com, please order a copy and help the kids.
https://www.createspace.com/3389758Now back to the debate. Fourteen courses have stayed on the list from 1997 (Pine Valley, Augusta National, Shinnecock Hills, Cypress Point, Oakmont, Pebble Beach, Merion, Winged Foot West, Seminole, National Golf Links, Crystal Downs, Wade Hampton, The Country Club and Medinah). Six have left the top 20 (Oakland Hills, Pinehurst #2, Olympic Club, Prairie Dunes, Shadow Creek and San Francisco GC) The six new entries are (Fishers Island, Oak Hill, Chicago GC, Sand Hills, Pacific Dunes and Muirfield Village).
Fishers should have been on the 1997 list, but they did not allow enough raters to play the course to get rated at that time. Sand Hills is a magnificent Crenshaw/Coores course that some have tried to copy, but it still stands out as incredibaly unique and fun to play. Pacific Dunes is beautifully routed and challenging, while the Chicago GC is a memorable throw-back to a more civilized time. Muirfield is my favorite Nicklaus course with many risk/reward holes. Oak Hill is the one that surprises me a bit, but is a stern test.
The six that left the top 20 are a combination of US Open courses and gems in their own right. Oakland Hills, Pinehurst #2 and the Olympic Club are all tough golf courses that factor high on the "resistence to scoring" gauge and less on the "memorability" gauge. Prairie Dunes and the SFGC are classic courses that fall in and out of the top 20 regularly and Shadow Creek is a purely man-made course that is fun, but I can't remember all 18 holes (after playing it twice).
Thus, the 2009 list is more versatile, rewarding well rounded designs with memorable layouts, versus the 1997 list which is heavier with tough courses that hold national championships.
What do you think?