Are Tom Doak's "least discussed" courses only those without ragged bunkers?

« **Reply #25 on:** January 09, 2008, 11:15:54 AM »

fwiw, the bunkers in pic 2 remind me of the bunkers at Pasa now

« **Reply #26 on:** January 09, 2008, 11:21:35 AM »

Quote from: Paul_Turner on January 09, 2008, 10:25:57 AM

Ragged bunkers=Sandy Site=Better Course?

Yes I think it a 'Cart before the horse thing'. At Riverfront they would of looked so out of place.

« **Reply #27 on:** January 09, 2008, 01:57:51 PM »

In all realilty, neither of the courses pictured looks natural, those sites are not sandy sites, so sand will not look natural any way you make it. I have nothing against courses being 'manufactured' though, I as a matter of fact like some of those type courses I have played.

« **Reply #28 on:** January 09, 2008, 04:52:49 PM »

For those wondering, the first picture is Hanse's work at French Creek and the second photo is Doak's at Stonewall.

« **Reply #29 on:** January 09, 2008, 06:46:15 PM »

*In the second picture notice the relationship between the cloud formations and bunker shapes

I didn't know Tom Doak was much into that philosophy.

News:

PThomas

Re:Are Tom Doak's "least discussed" courses only those without ragged bunkers?

Matthew Hunt

Re:Are Tom Doak's "least discussed" courses only those without ragged bunkers?

John Moore II

Re:Are Tom Doak's "least discussed" courses only those without ragged bunkers?

Mark_Fine

Re:Are Tom Doak's "least discussed" courses only those without ragged bunkers?

Ryan Farrow

Re:Are Tom Doak's "least discussed" courses only those without ragged bunkers?

An Error Has Occurred!