After watching some of the Schwab Cup from Sonoma GC today I am left perplexed and am hoping that some of the treehouse population can help calm me down.
Since I was the project designer for the complete reconstruction of the Sonoma GC in 1990 and am pretty aware of what each and every one of those greens does, I find it fairly odd as I watch the Golf Channel's coverage of the event when they talk about most of the putts on most of the greens as "breaking" toward San Pablo Bay (which is the northern-most appendage of S.F. Bay). This, of course, brings to mind the same type of pablulum one hears in the winter when the Tour comes to the SoCal desert and the announcer-speak turns toward putts breaking toward Indio. Am I the only one who finds this absurd?
Let's think about it.............as we all know greens contain micro-movements with complete disregard to their macro environment. The only possible exception being very grainy bermudagrass greens that do have a pronounced tendency to create grain that slants toward the setting sun.
But, with a bentgrass/poa annua surface such as we find at Sonoma I just don't get it. The Golf Channel announcers and the players they interview after their rounds all talk about the difficulty of "reading" the greens due to their relationship to the fall of the Sonoma valley to San Pablo Bay, but in reality lets think about the fact that each green has self-contained contours that have nothing, nothing to do with the presence of the bay which is about 15 miles away.
From the Sonoma site, the bay is due south whilst the Mayacamas mountains and the setting sun is due west, so the possible argument that the "grain" has something to do with the setting sun doesn't hold water.....or thatch.
This isn't the first or last time I have heard this from announcers or golfers and won't be the last. I just want to understand it. Tom Paul, are you listening, because I suppose more than most on this site you may be able to shed some light on this quandry. I just want to know.
Thank you.