News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Jay Flemma

Re:Great trees that would be replaced.
« Reply #50 on: April 15, 2007, 09:14:44 PM »
HOW BOUT THE HINKLE TREE!!

Can't let that one die!  Its a piece of golf course architecture history!

Jay Flemma

Re:Great trees that would be replaced.
« Reply #51 on: April 15, 2007, 09:18:23 PM »
The fifth hole at Crystal Downs would be wildly disappointing, IMO, without the tree.  

http://www.rsgcincinnati.com/Crystaldowns/golfcd5thtee-01.jpg

I whole-heartedly agree...the tree makes all the difference.

Chris Cupit

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Great trees that would be replaced.
« Reply #52 on: April 16, 2007, 10:02:38 AM »
I agree about the tree at Butler National ruining the hole.  I played there a few times in college and thought that the trees really screwed that hole up.  Trees on the inside of the hole and the grove at the end of the fairway mean that on a very long hole (450+ back in the late 80's) you had to hit a driver far, but not too far as you be stymied.  The way the trees played it wasn't just one but several that could block you.  

I've played a lot at Winged Foot but I fail to see how the tree on 10 East "made" the hole a good one.  No doubt it was a beautiful tree but on a short hole where you would hit 3w and wedge a tree hanging over/onto the green seems to be very gimmicky to me.  Were you supposed to lay up to have a longer iron in that you could keep under the limbs?  The green was not receptive to bouncing a ball on so what were you supposed to do?  Yes, it was a great tree--just in the wrong place.  


Baltusrol (lower) #5 had a nice tree that would be worth saving.  Also on the upper course I think on hole #1 there were some trees (or a tree) that forced a drive to be in the correct position.

At my home course there is a tree on the right of the fairway on #12 at The Honors Course that really narrows up the drive zone.  Losing it would take this short hole (350 yards) and make it defenseless.



Jim Bearden

Re:Great trees that would be replaced.
« Reply #53 on: April 16, 2007, 04:16:19 PM »
The sixth hole at CPC had a defining tree that had a low hanging branch that impacted how the hole was played. About 10 years ago it just collapsed due to rot or bugs and changed the hole completely.

What happened to the trees on 17.

Pat Howard

Re:Great trees that would be replaced.
« Reply #54 on: April 16, 2007, 07:17:54 PM »
The small forest in the middle of #17 CPC might be a candidate. The membership did pop for a support to prop up the dead one adjacent to #16, which I find very Tim-Burtonesque.




I'd love to see a new, healthy cypress take this one's place. It is, after all, the course emblem.

Mark Bourgeois

Re:Great trees that would be replaced.
« Reply #55 on: October 10, 2007, 09:43:04 PM »
Whaddya think?



Problem is, even if your tee ball slides off the ridge and down to position A in the swale, the branches still can affect your approach. That's one wide oak tree, isn't it?

Must not be Position A...

jim_lewis

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Great trees that would be replaced.
« Reply #56 on: October 10, 2007, 11:11:11 PM »
I can think of many trees that I would like to cut down. I can't think of a single one that I would replace if it were lost. No tree (on a golf course) was ever more cherished by the members than the great elm on the 10th at Winged Foot East. Even they had the good sense not to replace it when it was lost to Dutch Elm Disease in the early 90's. Too bad the owners at Pebble Beach did not apply the same good judgement to the tree on the 18th fairway.
"Crusty"  Jim
Freelance Curmudgeon

PGertner

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Great trees that would be replaced.
« Reply #57 on: October 11, 2007, 12:01:22 PM »
Not a single one...

Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back