The middle holes are good holes but they lack any real aspect of uniqueness that would put them in good company with what takes place prior and towards the very end of the round.
This I agree with...as I stated above I think they are the weaker holes on the course, and I agree that it's noticeably so, but I do not think they are objectively "really weak" as you said at first.
The 7th I actually like quite a bit - its one of the more challenging approaches made so by the elevation. The 8th feels like its ripped out of New England (which doesn't make it bad...just not unique).
The 9th, to me, is one of the weakest holes at the resort. It's non-remarkable, the green is blah, and the strange pinch at the prime-layup zone seems like a poor excuse for defense on a hole stretched over land that otherwise has none.
10 again has no real reason to be in Bandon, but this doesn't make it a bad hole - to me the strategy of this tee shot is one of the best on the course....bail right and come in over the waste bunker, take the aggressive line and carry the left junk but reward yourself with a better angle to the green. Add the bonus that the hole rewards different shot shapes off the tee and to the green and it's a demanding and solid strategic hole. But no, nothing about it makes it unique to Bandon.
11 I think takes a lot of unnecessary heat for the pond, but were that ocean I think that we'd be calling this hole world-class.
12 I mentioned earlier - I love the hump right of the green. It makes the hole for me.
The interior holes are not unique to the area, they could be on any course anywhere in the Northeast...they are the weaker holes, as a group, on the course, and criticism of them as not living up to the standards elsewhere I believe is merited...there's just a difference between criticizable and "really weak", to me. Seems we agree on this at least.
I'd rather play 7-12 at BT any day over 7-11 at BD.