A club I am familiar with is in the process of engaging a well known Ross restoration specialist. From what I have heard, the membership is somewhat split on how big of a restoration to do mostly over the issue of money. The younger crowd wants a "full" restoration that could allow the course to rise in prominence and come closer to resembling some old aerial footage, bunker numbers, etc. Some of the older members don't want a large assessment or much of any work done. The concern of many of the younger crowd is that the club will choose to fall somewhere in the middle and do a "shortcut restoration".
What really drives the cost of restorations? Is it adding bunkers, redoing greens, heavy grading? Obviously the more holes you work on the more money, but if a club were going to do a "shortcut restoration" of the entire course what would you likely lose? Does anyone have examples of what I am trying to describe at other clubs and how were the results? Was the shortcut version even worth doing in some of those instances?