I really enjoy when c-o-w-a-r-d-s hide behiond usig someone's name falsely. Shows plenty of guts on there part.
I have a different assessment than all the fawning that takes place. I have said more than a few times Maidstone's a fine course but I never have believed for a New York minute that the course comfortably resides within the top 50 in the USA.
For all those whimps out there that simply cherry-pick off the classic courses and rarely, if ever, venture out and see what great courses have come forward in plenty of locales in the USA I have just one thing to say -- enough of your mindless barking because your credibility -- lack thereof -- is simply so clear as to be painful.
Maidstone gets a residual push because it IS IN THE HAMPTONS -- not a bad neighborhood to be in with the legitimate likes of NGLA and SH. The dunes holes at Maidstone are grand stuff -- but for some reason those who harp on and on about the course really have more to do with the bloodlines of their friends than with the totality of its architectural elements IMHO.
One last thing -- for those who have never read Jersey Golfer magazine I'll be glad to forward copies and you can make your own opinions. We try as a publication to be an editorial service to our readers -- we are not some empty advertorial element that so often dominates the landscape of golf media one sees today.
Scott B -- Thanks for your comments.
TEPaul:
You need to actually see and play the broader array of courses that exist in the USA. You look at architecture in some sort of narrow way because your sampling size of courses is thin.
You often trash ratings and the like but do yourself a bigger favor and understand that there are people who do venture and see what's out there in the USA today -- and it's a bit more than simply going on and on about the same courses from the Northeast -- which do in fact many do deserve high praise -- the thing you fail to admit is that others can have an equally high passion for architecture and view it from a much broader perspective because they have a bigger base from which to compare / contrast.
Nothing more ... nothing less.