Having grown up on bentgrass greens but now living in Texas, I am largely disappointed with bermuda greens—especially those in central Texas, which just doesn't get enough rain to keep them satisfactorily lush.
However, I've recently realized that, without exception, Champion Bermuda greens provide the most consistent playing surfaces I've encountered south of the Mason-Dixon line. In fact, if I only got to play Champion greens, I could live happily without ever putting on bentgrass again (well, I wouldn't miss the bent too much).
From the firmness of the turf (due to the thicker, denser root system?) to the quality of the grain, Champion Bermuda seems to be a cut above other variants, such as Tif Dwarf, which is a popular alternative in central Texas.
My question is this: If Champion Bermuda is so obviously superior, why don't we see it on more courses in the South?
For example, a local muni in Austin (Jimmy Clay) just redid their greens...but they used Tif Dwarf. Thanks to a history of poa creep and sustainability issues on the greens, the super has no choice but to keep the grass longer to allow the roots to grow deeper. As a result, the playability is garbage, and the surfaces are clearly subpar compared to other courses in the area that feature Champion Bermuda.
What gives here? At this point, any club that chooses to redo their greens without Champion is nearing "complete write-off" status for me.