News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Ronald Montesano

  • Karma: +0/-0
Coming in 2024
~Elmira Country Club
~Soaring Eagles
~Bonavista
~Indian Hills
~Maybe some more!!

PCCraig

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2012, 05:55:44 PM »
H.P.S.

Mark Saltzman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2012, 06:03:29 PM »
Yikes sure to make some enemies with that list!

Is Southern Hills really one of the 10 worst? I liked it.

Jud_T

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #3 on: August 16, 2012, 06:31:27 PM »
A couple of headscratchers, including Olympia Fields.  I think the gist of it is from the perspective of a the interest of a television viewer, but I do give them credit for being critical of some big name tournament venues, something there's far too little of in most of these rags. 
Golf is a game. We play it. Somewhere along the way we took the fun out of it and charged a premium to be punished.- - Ron Sirak

Peter Pallotta

Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #4 on: August 16, 2012, 06:33:26 PM »
Brave folks - real outside the box thinking there. Just in the nick of time too.

Mark - my guess is that it's the kind of enemies that don't count much anymore.

Peter
« Last Edit: August 16, 2012, 06:36:07 PM by PPallotta »

Rick Shefchik

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #5 on: August 16, 2012, 06:52:18 PM »
I could have guessed eight of the 11 in about 15 seconds. Dave Hill sure figured out a way to become immortal.
"Golf is 20 percent mechanics and technique. The other 80 percent is philosophy, humor, tragedy, romance, melodrama, companionship, camaraderie, cussedness and conversation." - Grantland Rice

Andy Troeger

Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #6 on: August 16, 2012, 07:52:36 PM »
Disagree with Valhalla, which I think is actually a pretty interesting golf course. It just happened to be the course that didn't fit in 2000 with Augusta, Pebble, and TOC.

I also think Southern Hills is better than it gets credit for here. Ditto Olympia Fields, which has quite a bit of interest.

Medinah also gets a bad rap, but I'd like to know what's so different about it and Baltusrol Lower, which never makes these types of lists but is very much the same style of course. Medinah probably has more character of the two, although Baltusrol Upper might be better than either one.

Mike Vegis @ Kiawah

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #7 on: August 16, 2012, 08:25:15 PM »
It could be the SI influence.  Apparently, they're haters.  Most of the folks I've spoke to had a blast: 

http://www.golf.com/tour-and-news/pga-championship-logistics-kiawah-island-were-ugly

jeffwarne

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #8 on: August 16, 2012, 08:49:01 PM »
"they mowed different greens at different speeds to accomodate the old fashioned greens"
hard to respect a magazine that even prints that.
imagine that?....contour

It's funny how a magazine that glorified most of these courses in my youth now condemns many of them.
Fads are a great thing, until you realize they're fads.

I'm guessing George Peper had a closet full of bellbottoms.

Some pretty good champions in that mix
"Let's slow the damned greens down a bit, not take the character out of them." Tom Doak
"Take their focus off the grass and put it squarely on interesting golf." Don Mahaffey

Patrick_Mucci

Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #9 on: August 16, 2012, 08:59:18 PM »
Disagree with Valhalla, which I think is actually a pretty interesting golf course. It just happened to be the course that didn't fit in 2000 with Augusta, Pebble, and TOC.

I also think Southern Hills is better than it gets credit for here. Ditto Olympia Fields, which has quite a bit of interest.

Medinah also gets a bad rap, but I'd like to know what's so different about it and Baltusrol Lower, which never makes these types of lists but is very much the same style of course. Medinah probably has more character of the two, although Baltusrol Upper might be better than either one.


Andy, Baltusrol lower is essentially intact over the last 50 years, whereas, Medinah has seen more surgery than Joan Rivers.

JR Potts

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #10 on: August 16, 2012, 09:10:23 PM »
Disagree with Valhalla, which I think is actually a pretty interesting golf course. It just happened to be the course that didn't fit in 2000 with Augusta, Pebble, and TOC.

I also think Southern Hills is better than it gets credit for here. Ditto Olympia Fields, which has quite a bit of interest.

Medinah also gets a bad rap, but I'd like to know what's so different about it and Baltusrol Lower, which never makes these types of lists but is very much the same style of course. Medinah probably has more character of the two, although Baltusrol Upper might be better than either one.


Andy, Baltusrol lower is essentially intact over the last 50 years, whereas, Medinah has seen more surgery than Joan Rivers.

Pat:  so now surgeries matter?  That comment seems to fly in the face of your constant support of Augusta and its constant face-lifts.

That said, they picked 10 courses..and those courses have likely hosted almost half of the non-Augusta US majors over the past two decades....so, the list probably isn't too inaccurate....but also isn't too damning.
« Last Edit: August 16, 2012, 09:33:05 PM by JR Potts »

Jason Walker

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #11 on: August 16, 2012, 09:18:04 PM »
I've played six of them and had a GREAT experience at every single one of them.  Championship golf is different.  The sooner it gets realized and recognized, the better off we'll all be.     



« Last Edit: August 17, 2012, 08:01:32 AM by Jason Walker »

Jonathan Mallard

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #12 on: August 16, 2012, 09:49:39 PM »
They missed Kemper Lakes, Shoal Creek, and Atlanta Athletic Club.

JR Potts

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #13 on: August 16, 2012, 10:03:29 PM »
Championship golf is different.  The sooner it gets realized and recognized, the better off we'll all be.

Exactly! But it's not just Championship golf, it's what we expect Championship golf to be. 

Matt_Cohn

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #14 on: August 16, 2012, 10:59:08 PM »
I guess even the worst major championship venues are still pretty damn good golf courses.

Andy Troeger

Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #15 on: August 16, 2012, 11:17:39 PM »
They missed Kemper Lakes, Shoal Creek, and Atlanta Athletic Club.

Sure seems like they picked places that have hosted multiple majors over the years, although AAC qualifies under that logic too. Kemper Lakes isn't all that great, but Shoal Creek is a pretty decent golf course really, just too claustrophobic with the trees in spots.


Pat,
I'm not really that interested in the different variations of Medinah and Baltusrol Lower. I just think in their current configurations that they are similar golf courses. If you like long and tough championship courses they are both very good, but if you're looking for something a little more whimsical they're probably not at the top of your list. I just don't see much difference, other than perhaps the names of the architects associated with the designs.

Sam Morrow

Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #16 on: August 17, 2012, 01:13:10 AM »
This like most lists is retarded.

David_Elvins

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #17 on: August 17, 2012, 01:24:08 AM »
It's a reasonable list.

I am not sure anyone here could come up with a better list.
Ask not what GolfClubAtlas can do for you; ask what you can do for GolfClubAtlas.

Jon Wiggett

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #18 on: August 17, 2012, 01:42:02 AM »
Wow, interesting comments about RL&SA. I wonder if this was used as it was this years venue and they didn't know any other? Judging from what has been written thay have clearly not been to it in person.

Jon

David_Elvins

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #19 on: August 17, 2012, 01:57:56 AM »
Wow, interesting comments about RL&SA. I wonder if this was used as it was this years venue and they didn't know any other? Judging from what has been written thay have clearly not been to it in person.

Jon

Jon,

The critique was relatively consistent with other critiques, wasn't it?  eg. Darius Oliver in Planet Golf.
Ask not what GolfClubAtlas can do for you; ask what you can do for GolfClubAtlas.

Jon Wiggett

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #20 on: August 17, 2012, 05:59:59 AM »
David,

RL&SA has a good set of green complexes and the a back nine which few courses rival from a GCA point of view. The playing surfaces have plenty of contours to make for interesting play. As for no views of the see well you don't see the ocean from Royal Birkdale either and I fail to see what is wrong with having the clubhouse so close to the green but maybe you could enlighten me.

To me it seemed that RL&SA was included as a token gesture so as not to appear to be just criticising US courses. The criticisms were in some cases factually wrong and in others statements without saying what was wrong in the view of the writer. It is obvious to me that the writer of this piece has either no appreciation of good links GCA or had not even been to the course.

Jon

David Davis

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #21 on: August 17, 2012, 06:24:30 AM »
I agree RL & SA certainly doesn't belong on that list. Lacks drama and visual interest, yet look at the photo they place, by far the best photo in the group even. That the author would prefer to look at the sea above golf course architecture I can understand.

To say the course lacks drama would of been to miss Tiger trying to get out of that bunker on the last day, McDowell deterioration and Scott falling apart in the last 4 holes just to name a few. Amazing course and brilliant architecture, more drama than we could wish for but ok the town itself is not that picturesque.
Sharing the greatest experiences in golf.

IG: @top100golftraveler
www.lockharttravelclub.com

Michael George

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #22 on: August 17, 2012, 07:16:03 AM »
I applaud the list.  You may disagree with one or two of the golf courses on the list, but it contains a lot of golf courses that regularly get panned on this site.  Should a couple of other courses like AAC be included, probably, but every list has a couple of those.  Well done Golf Magazine. 

Mike Vegis - Kiawah was an incredible venue and I hope it hosts many more majors (I honestly enjoyed watching the venue more than any PGA Championship site in the last 20 years).  However, the logistics have been widely panned by a wide range of outlets.  Part of the charm of Kiawah Ocean is its remote location, but with it comes logistics problems.   I think it is better to accept the criticism and figure out how to improve them... rather than just dismiss them.
 
"First come my wife and children.  Next comes my profession--the law. Finally, and never as a life in itself, comes golf" - Bob Jones

Jerry Kluger

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #23 on: August 17, 2012, 07:29:37 AM »
I would argue that the first and most compelling argument one could make concerning the worst major championship venue is one where the best players were not the ones who were in contention and eventually won the tournament.  After all, isn't that the reason for having the event - the best players playing the best golf?  I haven't done the research so I cannot point to this with respect to any particular course but I do believe it is the best criteria. 

Concerning Kiawah, I had gone on family vacations to Kiawah in August for at least 7 years when my kids were young and I cannot remember ever having a rain issue and there was no pattern of overnight rain. The course is a great championship venue and the logistics for many of the courses are incredibly difficult for the spectators.  Golf allows the spectator to arrive in the morning and spend the entire day which can be 12 or 14 hours at the course so an hour getting to and from and course is really not that bad.   

David_Elvins

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Whom do we have on the inside at Golf Magazine?
« Reply #24 on: August 17, 2012, 08:41:42 AM »
David,

RL&SA has a good set of green complexes and the a back nine which few courses rival from a GCA point of view. The playing surfaces have plenty of contours to make for interesting play. As for no views of the see well you don't see the ocean from Royal Birkdale either and I fail to see what is wrong with having the clubhouse so close to the green but maybe you could enlighten me.

To me it seemed that RL&SA was included as a token gesture so as not to appear to be just criticising US courses. The criticisms were in some cases factually wrong and in others statements without saying what was wrong in the view of the writer. It is obvious to me that the writer of this piece has either no appreciation of good links GCA or had not even been to the course.

Jon

No idea whether the criticisms were right or wrong, Jon, just saying that most of them have been expressed elsewhere, including on this website.  If learned members of GolfClubAtlas call it the worst course on the Open Rota, then not sure we can be too critical of someone else jumping to the same conclusion.  Not that it isn't debatable, just that it isn't unreasonable.  I am not defending every selection on the list, just that it is a reasonable list.
« Last Edit: August 17, 2012, 08:46:20 AM by David_Elvins »
Ask not what GolfClubAtlas can do for you; ask what you can do for GolfClubAtlas.