Sean:
Where did I give such courses (mountain variety) a free pass ?
Read what I wrote my good man -- I did say this -- if cart rides become the ESSENCE of the time spent at such places than I have a major problem with them. Got it now.
Sean, we are much closer in our overall take then you might realize. I agree w Doak that often times if people can agree close to 85% of the time -- chalk up the rest as a healthy difference in opinion.
In regards to a top 100 listing in the USA -- I'm in the process in finalizing my thoughts. Likely I will tie it to a fee structure in which those courses selected cannot be above a certain amount so that what you said previously about such matters can be highlighted for an apples to apples effect.
Matt
No wonder you love goat tracks. To me, the essence of something you do is the reason you do it. I find it hard to believe that folks pay money just to drive a cart around. Don't be daft man, of course they pay to play so under your definition there is no such thing as a course whos essence is riding.
Just to make it VERY clear. To me, walking is a critical part of a routing which is a critical aspect of the quality of a course. If the course is a lousy walk, for whatever reason, then the routing is compromised and thus the quality of the golf is compromised. I am not saying that what to me amounts to separate holes linked together by paths can't overcome this major hurdle in a routing, but it is very difficult to do so. I have yet to see a course pull it off, but then I don't seek to play cart golf. You obviously are more open minded than myself when it comes to evaluating cart golf and that is what I mean when we seek different things in architecture.
Ciao