Having played with Anthony this last weekend, we had a good conversation about this very topic and I think we had a great example of differing architecture types with the courses we played...Harbour Town and Chechessee Creek.
Harbour Town seemed to "give us something" every hole. Real tight drive on various holes; in particular hole one, massive green fronting bunker on 13, massive fairway on 18, tree right in the middle of the damn fairway on 16...not to mention the alligator patrolling the rough...coffin bunker on 17, etc, etc, etc...interesting, unique, fun, challenging, exciting.
Then at Chechessee it seemed to be the exact opposite. The club and property were wonderful. Great golfing escape feeling...old school club house...wonderful. But the course was repetitive. In fact, all 18 greens sloped back to front, 16 of those 18 quite severe, and 14 of those 18 greens are right around 30 feet deep by 20 feet wide (approximately). So, once you got to the green or were approaching it...it was the same hole over and over and over. Nice course...great bunkering
...but that green was used too much.
I think this is what Anthony is talking about...I don't think he means that every hole needs to be over the top wild...simply interesting.
Frankly, I don't disagree...but I kind of like subtle courses as well.