Tony (and Scott and Mark)
I was not trying to improve on Colt's statement, just trying to interpret it. It could mean many things, including my speculations. BTW, Tony, "least bad" and "most good" are two very different propositions. As a lawyer, Colt would have been inclined to be very precise in his language.
I continue to believe that it is a unique and great golfing experience but not a great golf course. You should know that when I say the latter, I believe that by my standards there are only 20-30 "great" golf courses in the world, with the number probably closer to 20 than 30. I'm not at all dissing Swinley, just trying to express my view as to where it most comfortably sits when we are talking Club and/or architecture.
I also continue to be intrigued by the "philosophy of the imperfect" and how it might relate to GCA. Do we love the Old Course more or less because it has so many imperfetions? Does the 16th at Dornoch demean or enhance the course? Do even the greatest of modern architects err on the side of perfection rather than accepting imperfection for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to: client pressures; relatively unlimited budgets; hubris, etc.?
Any and all others are fully free to disagree.